ArticleInternational ophthalmology2019
Circumpapillary microperimetry to detect glaucoma: a pilot study for sector-based comparison to circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurement.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pericentral Scotometry Guided by Standard Perimetry Using Microperimetry in Glaucoma Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Structure-Function Mapping Using a Three-Dimensional Neuroretinal Rim Parameter Derived From Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Volume Scans.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- The Role of Multimodal Approach in the Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage in High Myopes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Circumpapillary structure-function relationships with microperimetry and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma: a pilot study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of circumpapillary microperimetry (MP) sensitivity and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (cpRNFLT) measured with optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of early to moderate open-angle glaucoma.
methodsEleven eyes (11 patients) with early or moderate open-angle glaucoma and seven normal eyes (7 subjects) underwent MP (MP-3 microperimeter, NIDEK, Japan) and cpRNFLT measurement (RS-3000 Advance OCT, NIDEK, Japan) using an identical circumpapillary circle and similar measurement sectors. The structure-function relationship and the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUROC) were investigated for each sector, respectively.
resultsSignificant differences (P < 0.05) between glaucoma and normal eyes were found for five of the 12 OCT sectors and seven of the 24 MP sectors. High correlation between cpRNFLT and MP sensitivity was found in the inferotemporal area (OCT sector 5) and superotemporal area (OCT sector 1) (r = 0.818, P < 0.001, and r = 0.796, P < 0.001, respectively). The AUROC values in these sectors ranged 0.890-1.000 for cpRNFLT and 0.825-0.981 for MP sensitivity. Overall, the AUROC ranged 0.506-1.000 for sector cpRNFLT and 0.591-0.981 for sector MP sensitivity.
conclusionsIn this pilot study, circumpapillary MP sensitivity and cpRNFLT showed similar diagnostic power. The structure-function relationship was strong for the superotemporal and inferotemporal circumpapillary areas. Our results suggest that circumpapillary MP represents a new aspect of microperimetry in glaucoma. Further studies on larger populations are necessary to clarify whether the current results are confirmed in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29249069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.