ArticleScience and engineering ethics2018
Google Search as an Additional Source in Systematic Reviews.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of hyperglycaemia and/or type 2 diabetes on women with breast cancer undergoing or post-cytotoxic chemotherapy: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Primary healthcare models for refugees involving nurses: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Developing a competency assessment framework for pharmacists in primary health care settings in India.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Bioethics of somatic gene therapy: what do we know so far?Current medical research and opinion · 2023Pooled it
- What do people think about genetic engineering? A systematic review of questionnaire surveys before and after the introduction of CRISPR.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Pooled it
- Camel (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2021Pooled it
- Contribution of a positive psychology-based conceptual framework in reducing physician burnout and improving well-being: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2021Pooled it
- Factors Affecting the Quality of Person-Generated Wearable Device Data and Associated Challenges: Rapid Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Pooled it
- The Value of Case Reports in Systematic Reviews from Rare Diseases. The Example of Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) in Patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II (MPS-II).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Using clinical reasoning ontologies to make smarter clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and data synthesis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Pooled it
- Quality Improvement Competencies for Health Care Quality Professionals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Community-based interventions for cognitive health in older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Practices for collecting, analyzing and disseminating data on health and its social determinants among Black populations in Quebec: a scoping review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025Article
- Apps and Digital Resources for Child Neurodevelopment, Mental Health, and Well-Being: Review, Evaluation, and Reflection on Current Resources.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- A scoping review of the existing evidence linking school food procurement contract type with school food provision.PloS one · 2025Article
- What is the level of nutrition care provided to older adults attending emergency departments? A scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Children's active school transportation: an international scoping review of psychosocial factors.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.