Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29249009›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2018

Health-related quality of life in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: validation of the German PCOSQ-G.

B Böttcher, S Fessler, F Friedl, B Toth, M H Walter, L Wildt, D Riedl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B BöttcherDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7745-9130
S FesslerDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Bruno-Sander-Haus, Innrain 52f, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
F FriedlDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Bruno-Sander-Haus, Innrain 52f, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
B TothDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
M H WalterDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Bruno-Sander-Haus, Innrain 52f, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
L WildtDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
D RiedlUniversity Clinic of Medical Psychology, Medical University Innsbruck, Schöpfstr. 23a, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. david.riedl@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-3144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) report a decreased health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and higher levels of psychological distress. Validated questionnaires are necessary to assess the impact of PCOS on patients' lives. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the German "Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Questionnaire" (PCOSQ-G).

methodsThe psychometric properties of the PCOSQ-G were investigated in PCOS patients with item-total correlation, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Correlations with the Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) were calculated to evaluate the validity of the PCOSQ-G. Discriminatory validity was investigated through a receiver operating characteristic curve and independent sample t tests compared with healthy controls.

resultsGood psychometric properties were found for most items. Acceptable to high internal consistency was found for the total score (α = 0.94-0.95) and all subscales (α = 0.70-0.97). High test-retest reliability was found for the total score (0.86) and all subscales (0.81-0.90). The validity analyses showed that the PCOSQ-G total score was positively correlated with both SF-36 summary scales and was negatively correlated with both HADS subscales. Patients reported significantly lower values for the PCOSQ-G total score (p < 0.001) and all subscales, and the PCOSQ-G discriminated well between patients and healthy controls (AUC = 0.81, p < 0.001).

conclusionsPCOSQ-G is a reliable and valid tool to assess the HRQOL in patients with PCOS and can be used in future clinical research. Patients with PCOS exhibited an impaired HRQOL, which indicates the need for psychosomatic counseling.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAnxietyAustriaCase-Control StudiesDepressionFemaleHealth StatusHumansMiddle AgedPolycystic Ovary SyndromePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsAnxietyDepressionPCOSQPCOSQ-G validationPolycystic ovary syndromeQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID29249009
PMCPMC5849657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.