Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29248864›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2018

Examination of approach and avoidance inclinations on the reinforcing value of alcohol.

Emily T Noyes, Robert C Schlauch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily T NoyesDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, United States.
Robert C SchlauchDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, United States. Electronic address: rschlauch@usf.edu.

Funding

Ambivalence Model of Craving: Re-examining the Craving-Drinking RelationshipK23AA021768 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI SCHLAUCH, ROBERT CHARLES · 2013 to 2017
$629k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA021768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although behavioral economics tends to focus on environmental factors (i.e., price, availability) that act to influence valuation of alcohol, recent research has begun to address how motivational and cognitive factors influence an individual's demand for alcohol. Motivational states, including craving, are one possible mechanism underlying the value based decision making that demand represents. Using a multidimensional model of craving (Ambivalence Model of Craving), the current study examined the relationships between indices of alcohol demand (i.e., reinforcing value of alcohol) and craving (i.e., approach inclinations), and the ways in which competing desires moderate that relationship (i.e., avoidance inclinations). Individuals who reported consuming alcohol in the past month were recruited for the study using Amazon's Mechanical Turk. A total of 529 participants (mean age=33.03years, SD=8.85) completed a series of surveys assessing their drinking behavior and other alcohol-related measures. Multiple regression analyses indicated that while approach significantly predicted intensity (i.e., consumption at zero cost), O

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningChoice BehaviorCravingReinforcement, PsychologyAdultAlcohol DrinkingEconomics, BehavioralFemaleHumansMaleMotivationRegression AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesAlcoholApproachAvoidanceBehavioral economicsCraving

Identifiers

PMID29248864
PMCPMC5807229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.