Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29248818›Full record

ArticlePapillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2018

Barriers, facilitators, and potential strategies for increasing HPV vaccination: A statewide assessment to inform action.

Kathleen B Cartmell, Jennifer Young-Pierce, Shannon McGue, Anthony J Alberg, John S Luque, Maria Zubizarreta, Heather M Brandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathleen B CartmellMedical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, College of Nursing, Charleston, SC, United States. Electronic address: cartmelk@musc.edu.
Jennifer Young-PierceMedical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Charleston, SC, United States.
Shannon McGueMedical University of South Carolina, College of Medicine, Charleston, SC, United States.
Anthony J AlbergMedical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Public Health Sciences, United States.
John S LuqueMedical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Public Health Sciences, United States.
Maria ZubizarretaUniversity of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, United States.
Heather M BrandtUniversity of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, United States.

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND N. DUBOIS · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Research Center (SC CADRE)U54CA210962 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CARROLL, STEVEN L. · 2017 to 2023
$6.7M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Research Center (SC CaDRe)U54CA210963 · NCI · SOUTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WARSHAMANA-GREENE, GNANA SAKUNTALA · 2017 to 2023
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210962NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to investigate how state level strategies in South Carolina could maximize HPV vaccine uptake.

designAn environmental scan identified barriers, facilitators, and strategies for improving HPV vaccination in South Carolina. Interviews were conducted with state leaders from relevant organizations such as public health agencies, medical associations, K-12 schools, universities, insurers, and cancer advocacy organizations. A thematic content analysis design was used. Digital interview files were transcribed, a data dictionary was created and data were coded using the data dictionary.

resultsThirty four interviews were conducted with state leaders. Barriers to HPV vaccination included lack of HPV awareness, lack of provider recommendation, HPV vaccine concerns, lack of access and practice-level barriers. Facilitators included momentum for improving HPV vaccination, school-entry Tdap requirement, pharmacy-based HPV vaccination, state immunization registry, HEDIS measures and HPV vaccine funding. Strategies for improving HPV vaccination fell into three categories: 1) addressing lack of awareness about the importance of HPV vaccination among the public and providers; 2) advocating for policy changes around HPV vaccine coverage, vaccine education, and pharmacy-based vaccination; and 3) coordination of efforts. DISCUSSION: A statewide environmental scan generated a blueprint for action to be used to improve HPV vaccination in the state.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansImmunization ProgramsMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesSouth CarolinaSurveys and QuestionnairesPapillomavirus VaccinesBarriersCervical cancerFacilitatorsHealth systemsHPVHPV vaccinesPreventionSouth CarolinaStrategies

Identifiers

PMID29248818
PMCPMC5886972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.