Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29248698›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Multiple time courses of somatosensory responses in human cortex.

P Avanzini, V Pelliccia, G Lo Russo, G A Orban, G Rizzolatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Long-latency gamma modulation after median nerve stimulation delineates the central sulcus and contrasts the states of consciousness.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural surprise in somatosensory Bayesian learning.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. System neuroscience: Past, present, and future.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P AvanziniIstituto di Neuroscienze, Consiglio nazionale delle Ricerche - CNR, Parma, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, University of Parma, Italy. Electronic address: pietro.avanzini@cnr.it.
V PellicciaDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, University of Parma, Italy; Centro per la chirurgia dell'Epilessia "Claudio Munari", Ospedale Ca'Granda-Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
G Lo RussoCentro per la chirurgia dell'Epilessia "Claudio Munari", Ospedale Ca'Granda-Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
G A OrbanDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, University of Parma, Italy.
G RizzolattiIstituto di Neuroscienze, Consiglio nazionale delle Ricerche - CNR, Parma, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, University of Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we show how anatomical and functional data recorded from patients undergoing stereo-EEG can be used to decompose the cortical processing following nerve stimulation in different stages characterized by specific topography and time course. Tibial, median and trigeminal nerves were stimulated in 96 patients, and the increase in gamma power was evaluated over 11878 cortical sites. All three nerve datasets exhibited similar clusters of time courses: phasic, delayed/prolonged and tonic, which differed in topography, temporal organization and degree of spatial overlap. Strong phasic responses of the three nerves followed the classical somatotopic organization of SI, with no overlap in either time or space. Delayed responses presented overlaps between pairs of body parts in both time and space, and were confined to the dorsal motor cortices. Finally, tonic responses occurred in the perisylvian region including posterior insular cortex and were evoked by the stimulation of all three nerves, lacking any spatial and temporal specificity. These data indicate that the somatosensory processing following nerve stimulation is a multi-stage hierarchical process common to all three nerves, with the different stages likely subserving different functions. While phasic responses represent the neural basis of tactile perception, multi-nerve tonic responses may represent the neural signature of processes sustaining the capacity to become aware of tactile stimuli.

Indexed as

AdultBrain WavesCerebral CortexElectric StimulationElectrocorticographyEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryGamma RhythmHumansPeripheral NervesSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedTime FactorsTouch PerceptionCerebral cortexElectrical stimulationHumanPeripheral nervesStereo EEGTouch

Identifiers

PMID29248698
PMCPMC5864517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.