ReviewExperimental hematology2018
A vicious interplay between genetic and environmental insults in the etiology of blood cancers.
Review in Experimental hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Inflammation in CMML Pathobiology and Progression.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025Review
- Perspective: Food Environment, Climate Change, Inflammation, Diet, and Health.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Review
- Transforming growth factor-β signaling modifies the hematopoietic acute inflammatory response to drive bone marrow failure.Haematologica · 2022Article
- Resident Self-Tissue of Proinflammatory Cytokines Rather Than Their Systemic Levels Correlates with Development of Myelofibrosis inBiomolecules · 2022Article
- Functional interdependence of hematopoietic stem cells and their niche in oncogene promotion of myeloproliferative neoplasms: the 159th biomedical version of "it takes two to tango".Experimental hematology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Over the years, the etiology of cancer has been attributed alternatively to genetic and environmental insults. According to the genetic hypothesis, cancer cells arise from the acquisition of mutations that dysregulate the intrinsic mechanisms controlling normal cell growth and survival. In contrast, the environmental hypothesis holds that cancer can be caused by multiple extrinsic challenges that alter normal tissue homeostasis, but may not necessarily involve mutations. It is, however, quite possible that these two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. According to this third hypothesis, environmental challenges, by mechanisms still poorly understood, may act by imposing a selection pressure that confers a proliferative advantage on cells carrying specific driver mutations, leading to disease initiation. The authors of a brief report published in this journal (Exp Hematol. 2017;56:1-6) tested this third hypothesis experimentally and provide new evidence that chronic inflammation, by increasing tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, may positively select malignant hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) carrying loss-of-function TET2 mutations that switch the TNF-α signaling responses to activate proliferation rather than inducing quiescence. Furthermore, these mutations skew hematopoietic differentiation toward the myelomonocytic lineage and the output of macrophages producing TNF-α constitutively, promoting further environment-independent expansion of the malignant HSCs. These findings support a model in which the formation of a malignant population is triggered by a vicious interplay between genetic (TET2 mutations) and environmental (inflammation) insults, suggesting the need for strategies that target both the malignant cells and their environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.