Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29248527›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2018

Inhibiting Mesolimbic Dopamine Neurons Reduces the Initiation and Maintenance of Instrumental Responding.

Sarah Fischbach-Weiss, Rebecca M Reese, Patricia H Janak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modulation of hierarchical motor sequence learning by alpha-synuclein and the adenosine ANeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhanced cognitive flexibility and phasic striatal dopamine dynamics in a mouse model of low striatal tonic dopamine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  5. KAddiction biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Challenges to Body Fluid Homeostasis Differentially Recruit Phasic Dopamine Signaling in a Taste-Selective Manner.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah Fischbach-WeissNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Rebecca M ReeseDepartment of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Patricia H JanakDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: patricia.janak@jhu.edu.

Funding

Optogenetic Testing of Mechanims of Dopamine Action in Pavlovian LearningR01DA035943 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JANAK, PATRICIA H. · 2014 to 2023
$4.1M
Synaptic plasticity in the VTA after behavioral sensitization & cocaine self-admiR01DA015096 · NIDA · ERNEST GALLO CLINIC AND RESEARCH CENTER · PI JANAK, PATRICIA H. · 2002 to 2011
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015096NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesolimbic dopamine perturbations modulate performance of reward-seeking behavior, with tasks requiring high effort being especially vulnerable to disruption of dopamine signaling. Previous work primarily investigated long-term perturbations such as receptor antagonism and dopamine depletion, which constrain the ability to assess dopamine contributions to effort expenditure in isolation from other behavior events, such as reward consumption. Also unclear is if dopamine is required for both initiation and maintenance when a sequence of multiple instrumental responses is required. Here we used optogenetic inhibition of midbrain TH+  neurons to probe the role of dopamine neuron activity during instrumental responding for reward by varying the time epoch of neural inhibition relative to the time of response initiation. Within a fixed-ratio procedure, requiring eight nosepoke responses per reinforcer delivery, or a progressive ratio (PR) procedure, in which within-session response requirements increased exponentially, inhibiting dopamine neurons while mice were engaged in response bouts decreased the probability of continued responding. If inhibition occurred during each attempted bout, the effect was to decrease total responses, and thus amount of rewards earned, over a session. In contrast, if inhibition was applied only during some bouts, mice increased the number of bouts initiated to earn control levels of reward. Inhibiting dopamine neurons while mice were not responding decreased the probability of initiating an instrumental response but had no effect on the amount of effort exerted over the entire session. We conclude that midbrain dopamine signaling promotes initiation of instrumental responding and maintains motivation to continue ongoing bouts of effortful responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, OperantDopaminergic NeuronsInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMesencephalonMice, TransgenicMotor ActivityOptogeneticsReinforcement ScheduleRewardTyrosine 3-MonooxygenaseTyrosine 3-Monooxygenaseinstrumental learningmotivationoptogeneticsprogressive ratioventral tegmental area

Identifiers

PMID29248527
PMCPMC5942212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.