Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29248399›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2018

Palliative chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for dysphagia in advanced oesophageal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TROG 03.01).

Michael G Penniment, Paolo B De Ieso, Jennifer A Harvey, Sonya Stephens, Heather-Jane Au, Christopher J O'Callaghan, Andrew Kneebone, Samuel Y Ngan, Iain G Ward, Rajarshi Roy and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06745219 (Herombopag for the Prevention of Radio-chemotherapy Induced Thrombocytopenia in Cervical Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06745219 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Herombopag for the Prevention of Radio-chemotherapy Induced Thrombocytopenia in Cervical Cancer: A Single-arm Phase II Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsThrombopenia, Cervical Cancer, Radiotherapy Side Effect, Chemotherapeutic ToxicityArmsherombopag
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Best Practices in Esophageal, Gastroduodenal, and Colonic Stenting.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  20. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael G PennimentRoyal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Paolo B De IesoAlan Walker Cancer Care Centre, Darwin, NT, Australia. Electronic address: paolo.deieso@nt.gov.au.
Jennifer A HarveyPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia.
Sonya StephensRoyal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Heather-Jane AuCross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Christopher J O'CallaghanCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Andrew KneeboneRoyal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Samuel Y NganPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Iain G WardCanterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Rajarshi RoyCastle Hill Hospital, Hull, UK.
Jennifer G SmithPlain Statistics Pty Ltd, Horsham, VIC, Australia.
Tirath NijjarCross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
James J BiagiCancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Liam A MulroyQEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Rebecca WongPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
TROG 03.01/CCTG ES.2 group
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUCancer Council Northern Territory · AUCastle Hill Hospital · GBEnvironment Canterbury · NZPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre · CAQueen's University · CARoyal North Shore Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA short course of radiotherapy is commonly prescribed for palliative relief of malignant dysphagia in patients with incurable oesophageal cancer. We compared chemoradiotherapy with radiotherapy alone for dysphagia relief in the palliative setting.

methodsThis multicentre randomised controlled trial included patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer who were randomly assigned (1:1) through a computer-generated adaptive biased coin design to either palliative chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone for treatment of malignant dysphagia at 22 hospitals in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the UK. Eligible patients had biopsy-proven oesophageal cancer that was unsuitable for curative treatment, symptomatic dysphagia, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate haematological and renal function. Patients were stratified by hospital, dysphagia score (Mellow scale 1-4), and presence of metastases. The radiotherapy dose was 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks for patients in Australia and New Zealand and 30 Gy in ten fractions over 2 weeks for patients in Canada and the UK. Chemotherapy consisted of one cycle of intravenous cisplatin (either 80 mg/m

findingsBetween July 7, 2003, and March 21, 2012, 111 patients were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy and 109 patients to radiotherapy. One patient in the chemoradiotherapy group was omitted from analysis because of ineligibility. 50 (45%, 95% CI 36-55) patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and 38 (35%, 26-44) in the radiotherapy group obtained dysphagia relief (difference 10·6%, 95% CI -2 to 23; p=0·13). Median dysphagia progression-free survival was 4·1 months (95% CI 3·5-4·8) versus 3·4 months (3·1-4·3) in the chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy groups, respectively (p=0·58), and median overall survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 5·1-8·3) versus 6·7 months (4·9-8·0), respectively (p=0·88). Of the 211 patients who commenced radiotherapy, grade 3-4 acute toxicity occurred in 38 (36%) patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and in 17 (16%) patients in the radiotherapy group (p=0·0017). Anaemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, oesophagitis, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, and mucositis were significantly worse in patients who had chemoradiotherapy than in patients who had radiotherapy.

interpretationPalliative chemoradiotherapy showed a modest, but not statistically significant, increase in dysphagia relief compared with radiotherapy alone, with minimal improvement in dysphagia progression-free survival and overall survival with chemoradiotherapy but at a cost of increased toxicity. A short course of radiotherapy alone should be considered a safe and well tolerated treatment for malignant dysphagia in the palliative setting.

fundingNational Health and Medical Research Council, Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, and Cancer Australia.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDeglutition DisordersEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPalliative CareRadiotherapyAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinFluorouracil

Identifiers

PMID29248399
OpenAlexW2772199209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.