Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29247875›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2018

Autocalibration method for non-stationary CT bias correction.

Gonzalo Vegas-Sánchez-Ferrero, Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo, George R Washko, Raúl San José Estépar

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A CT Scan Harmonization Technique to Detect Emphysema and Small Airway Diseases.Image analysis for moving organ, breast, and thoracic images : third International Workshop, RAMBO 2018, fourth International Workshop, BIA 2018, and first International Workshop, TIA 2018, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada,... · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gonzalo Vegas-Sánchez-FerreroApplied Chest Imaging Laboratory (ACIL), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1249 Boylston St. 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Biomedical Image Technologies Laboratory (BIT), ETSI Telecomunicacion, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, and CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: gvegas@bwh.havard.edu.
Maria J Ledesma-CarbayoBiomedical Image Technologies Laboratory (BIT), ETSI Telecomunicacion, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, and CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain.
George R WashkoApplied Chest Imaging Laboratory (ACIL), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1249 Boylston St. 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
Raúl San José EstéparApplied Chest Imaging Laboratory (ACIL), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1249 Boylston St. 02115, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

The clinical impact of pulmonary vascular remodeling in smokersR01HL116473 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAN JOSE ESTEPAR, RAUL, WASHKO, GEORGE R · 2013 to 2021
$5.0M
Airway Inspector: a chest imaging biomarker software platform for COPDR01HL116931 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAN JOSE ESTEPAR, RAUL · 2013 to 2017
$2.2M
CT-based Predictors of ILA Progression in COPDGeneR21HL140422 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAN JOSE ESTEPAR, RAUL · 2017 to 2018
$264k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116473NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116931NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL140422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is a widely used imaging modality for screening and diagnosis. However, the deleterious effects of radiation exposure inherent in CT imaging require the development of image reconstruction methods which can reduce exposure levels. The development of iterative reconstruction techniques is now enabling the acquisition of low-dose CT images whose quality is comparable to that of CT images acquired with much higher radiation dosages. However, the characterization and calibration of the CT signal due to changes in dosage and reconstruction approaches is crucial to provide clinically relevant data. Although CT scanners are calibrated as part of the imaging workflow, the calibration is limited to select global reference values and does not consider other inherent factors of the acquisition that depend on the subject scanned (e.g. photon starvation, partial volume effect, beam hardening) and result in a non-stationary noise response. In this work, we analyze the effect of reconstruction biases caused by non-stationary noise and propose an autocalibration methodology to compensate it. Our contributions are: 1) the derivation of a functional relationship between observed bias and non-stationary noise, 2) a robust and accurate method to estimate the local variance, 3) an autocalibration methodology that does not necessarily rely on a calibration phantom, attenuates the bias caused by noise and removes the systematic bias observed in devices from different vendors. The validation of the proposed methodology was performed with a physical phantom and clinical CT scans acquired with different configurations (kernels, doses, algorithms including iterative reconstruction). The results confirmed the suitability of the proposed methods for removing the intra-device and inter-device reconstruction biases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCalibrationHumansLungObserver VariationPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiasComputed tomographyLow-doseNon-stationary noise

Identifiers

PMID29247875
PMCPMC6071427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.