Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29247499›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2018

Cardiac output changes after osmotic therapy in neurosurgical and neurocritical care patients: a systematic review of the clinical literature.

Georgia Tsaousi, Elisabetta Stazi, Marco Cinicola, Federico Bilotta

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fluid-therapy for Brain Surgery: A Narrative Review.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mobilization in Neurocritical Care: Challenges and Opportunities.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgia TsaousiDepartment of Anesthesiology and ICU, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3806-837X
Elisabetta StaziDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Marco CinicolaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Federico BilottaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimOsmotherapy constitutes a first-line intervention for intracranial hypertension management. However, hyperosmolar solutes exert various systematic effects, among which their impact on systemic haemodynamics is poorly clarified. This review aims to appraise the clinical evidence of the effect of mannitol and hypertonic saline (HTS) on cardiac performance in neurosurgical and neurocritical care patients.

methodA database search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials and observational studies reporting HTS or mannitol use in acute brain injury setting. The primary end-points were alterations of cardiac output (CO) and other haemodynamic variables, while the impact of osmotic agents on intracranial pressure, brain relaxation, plasma osmolality, electrolyte levels and urinary output constituted secondary outcomes.

resultsEight studies, enrolling 182 patients in total, were included. HTS exerted a more profound cardiac output augmentation than mannitol, but no distinct difference between groups occurred. Central venous pressure, stroke volume and stroke volume variation were favourably affected by both osmotic agents, whilst the reported changes in blood pressure were inconclusive. HTS infusion yielded a larger intracranial pressure reduction than mannitol but had an equivalent effect on brain relaxation. Mannitol presented a more potent diuretic effect than HTS. Effect on serum osmolality was alike in both osmotic agents, but contrary to HTS-promoted hypernatraemia, mannitol use induced transient hyponatraemia.

conclusionsMannitol or HTS administration seems to induce an enhancement of cardiac performance; being more prominent after HTS infusion. This effect combined with mannitol-induced enhancement of diuresis and HTS-promoted increase of plasma sodium concentration could partially explain the effects of osmotherapy on cerebral haemodynamics.

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputCritical CareDiuretics, OsmoticHemodynamicsHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureMannitolRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaline Solution, HypertonicDiuretics, OsmoticMannitolSaline Solution, Hypertoniccardiac outputcardiac performancehypertonic salinemannitolosmotherapysystemic haemodynamics

Identifiers

PMID29247499
PMCPMC5867072
OpenAlexW2775748113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.