Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29247496›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2017

Ametropia, retinal anatomy, and OCT abnormality patterns in glaucoma. 1. Impacts of refractive error and interartery angle.

Tobias Elze, Neda Baniasadi, Qingying Jin, Hui Wang, Mengyu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Retinal Vessel Automatic Segmentation Using SegNet.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tobias ElzeSchepens Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massac, United States.
Neda BaniasadiSchepens Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massac, United States.
Qingying JinSchepens Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massac, United States.
Hui WangSchepens Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massac, United States.
Mengyu WangSchepens Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massac, United States.
Harvard University · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY003790 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Patricia Ann D'Amore · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Psychophysical Correlates of Neurodegeneration in GlaucomaR01EY018664 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BEX, PETER JOHN · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003790NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) is widely used in clinical practice to support glaucoma diagnosis. Clinicians frequently interpret peripapillary RNFLT areas marked as abnormal by OCT machines. However, presently, clinical OCT machines do not take individual retinal anatomy variation into account, and according diagnostic biases have been shown particularly for patients with ametropia. The angle between the two major temporal retinal arteries (interartery angle, IAA) is considered a fundamental retinal ametropia marker. Here, we analyze peripapillary spectral domain OCT RNFLT scans of 691 glaucoma patients and apply multivariate logistic regression to quantitatively compare the diagnostic bias of spherical equivalent (SE) of refractive error and IAA and to identify the precise retinal locations of false-positive/negative abnormality marks. Independent of glaucoma severity (visual field mean deviation), IAA/SE variations biased abnormality marks on OCT RNFLT printouts at 36.7%/22.9% of the peripapillary area, respectively. 17.2% of the biases due to SE are not explained by IAA variation, particularly in inferonasal areas. To conclude, the inclusion of SE and IAA in OCT RNFLT norms would help to increase diagnostic accuracy. Our detailed location maps may help clinicians to reduce diagnostic bias while interpreting retinal OCT scans.

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceGlaucomaHumansMultivariate AnalysisRefractive ErrorsRetinaRetinal Arteryabnormality patternsglaucomamyopiaoptical coherence tomographyrefractive error

Identifiers

PMID29247496
PMCPMC5730847
OpenAlexW2773218275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.