Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29247365›Full record

Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2018

Full-thickness skin graft vs. synthetic mesh in the repair of giant incisional hernia: a randomized controlled multicenter study.

L Clay, B Stark, U Gunnarsson, K Strigård

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Case report of an enormous ventral hernia containing a kidney.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Hernia repair using autografts.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L ClayDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), H9, Karolinska Institutet, 171 64, Stockholm, Sweden.
B StarkDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 64, Stockholm, Sweden.
U GunnarssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, 907 85, Umeå, Sweden.
K StrigårdDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, 907 85, Umeå, Sweden. karin.strigard@umu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-9133
Karolinska Institutet · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRepair of large incisional hernias includes the implantation of a synthetic mesh, but this may lead to pain, stiffness, infection and enterocutaneous fistulae. Autologous full-thickness skin graft as on-lay reinforcement has been tested in eight high-risk patients in a proof-of-concept study, with satisfactory results. In this multicenter randomized study, the use of skin graft was compared to synthetic mesh in giant ventral hernia repair.

methodsNon-smoking patients with a ventral hernia > 10 cm wide were randomized to repair using an on-lay autologous full-thickness skin graft or a synthetic mesh. The primary endpoint was surgical site complications during the first 3 months. A secondary endpoint was patient comfort. Fifty-three patients were included. Clinical evaluation was performed at a 3-month follow-up appointment.

resultsThere were fewer patients in the skin graft group reporting discomfort: 3 (13%) vs. 12 (43%) (p = 0.016). Skin graft patients had less pain and a better general improvement. No difference was seen regarding seroma; 13 (54%) vs. 13 (46%), or subcutaneous wound infection; 5 (20%) vs. 7 (25%). One recurrence appeared in each group. Three patients in the skin graft group and two in the synthetic mesh group were admitted to the intensive care unit.

conclusionNo difference was seen for the primary endpoint short-term surgical complication. Full-thickness skin graft appears to be a reliable material for ventral hernia repair producing no more complications than when using synthetic mesh. Patients repaired with a skin graft have less subjective abdominal wall symptoms.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaPostoperative ComplicationsAbdominal WallAdultAgedBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstheses and ImplantsRecurrenceSkin TransplantationSurgical MeshBiocompatible MaterialsAbdominal wall reconstructionFull-thickness skinHernia complicationIncisional herniaInfectionVentral hernia

Identifiers

PMID29247365
PMCPMC5937886
OpenAlexW2771341221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.