Trial reportEuropean radiology2018
Round-the-clock performance of coronary CT angiography for suspected acute coronary syndrome: Results from the BEACON trial.
Trial report in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of a Deep Neural Network Algorithm Based on a Small Medical Image Dataset: Incremental Impact of 3D-to-2D Reformation Combined with Novel Data Augmentation, Photometric Conversion, or Transfer Learning.Journal of digital imaging · 2020Article
- Tegafur deteriorates established cardiovascular atherosclerosis in colon cancer: A case report and review of the literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) outside office hours.
methodsPatients with symptoms suggestive of an ACS underwent CCTA at the emergency department 24 hours, 7 days a week. A total of 118 patients, of whom 89 (75 %) presented during office hours (weekdays between 07:00 and 17:00) and 29 (25 %) outside office hours (weekdays between 17:00 and 07:00, weekends and holidays) underwent CCTA. Image quality was evaluated per coronary segment by two experienced readers and graded on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 3.
resultsThere were no significant differences in acquisition parameters, beta-blocker administration or heart rate between patients presenting during office hours and outside office hours. The median quality score per patient was 30.5 [interquartile range 26.0-33.5] for patients presenting during office hours in comparison to 27.5 [19.75-32.0] for patients presenting outside office hours (p=0.043). The number of non-evaluable segments was lower for patients presenting during office hours (0 [0-1.0] vs. 1.0 [0-4.0], p=0.009).
conclusionImage quality of CCTA outside office hours in the diagnosis of suspected ACS is diminished. KEY POINTS: • Quality scores were higher for coronary-CTA during office hours. • There were no differences in acquisition parameters. • There was a non-significant trend towards higher heart rates outside office hours. • Coronary-CTA on the ED requires state-of-the-art scanner technology and sufficiently trained staff. • Coronary-CTA on the ED needs preparation time and optimisation of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.