ArticleHerz2018
[Anticoagulation strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary artery embolisms].
Article in Herz, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Rectal bleeding in a 60-year-old woman under anticoagulation and platelet aggregation inhibition].Der Internist · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary artery embolisms share pathophysiological features and are therefore collectively referred to as venous thromboembolisms (VTE). While the incidence of VTE has been increasing for years as a result of demographic changes and improved diagnostics, the morbidity and mortality are decreasing. This is particularly due to more sensitive diagnostics, improvements in risk stratification and more effective anticoagulation strategies. The aim of effective anticoagulation therapy is the avoidance of early events up to death and prevention of recurrent events. Anticoagulation treatment should be started with either heparins (unfractionated or low molecular weight), the pentasaccharide fondaparinux or direct oral anticoagulants. Patients with recurrent events qualify for indefinite anticoagulation treatment. For a first episode of VTE anticoagulation treatment for at least 3 months is recommended (maintenance therapy). Subsequently, prolonged maintenance therapy for secondary prevention can be meaningful, depending on the individual patient risk (provoked event, risk for recurrence or bleeding). The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have now also been approved for this indication. As a result of a probably permanently high risk for recurrent events of up to 10% per year after cessation of anticoagulation, insufficient scores for estimation of the risk of bleeding and recent data documenting the safety and efficacy of NOACs for secondary prevention, a shift towards prolonged anticoagulation of 3-6 months or even indefinite (>1 year) treatment can be anticipated for patients after thromboembolic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.