Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29247253›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2018

Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research.

Ahmet Erdemir, Peter J Hunter, Gerhard A Holzapfel, Leslie M Loew, John Middleton, Christopher R Jacobs, Perumal Nithiarasu, Rainlad Löhner, Guowei Wei, Beth A Winkelstein and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reproducibility in modeling and simulation of the knee: Academic, industry, and regulatory perspectives.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Assessment of reporting practices and reproducibility potential of a cohort of published studies in computational knee biomechanics.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Personalized medicine for patients with COPD: where are we?International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 5 countries.

Ahmet ErdemirDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biomodeling (CoBi) Core, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (ND20), Cleveland, OH 44195 e-mail: .
Peter J HunterAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Gerhard A HolzapfelInstitute of Biomechanics, Graz University of Technology, Graz 8010, Austria.
Leslie M LoewCenter for Cell Analysis and Modeling, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032.
John MiddletonDepartment of Orthodontics, Biomaterials/Biomechanics Research Centre, School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.
Christopher R JacobsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Perumal NithiarasuZienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK.
Rainlad LöhnerDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Center for Computational Fluid Dynamics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030.
Guowei WeiDepartment of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Beth A WinkelsteinDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Victor H BarocasDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Farshid GuilakDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Joy P KuDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Jennifer L HicksDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Scott L DelpDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Michael SacksDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Jeffrey A WeissDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Gerard A AteshianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Steve A MaasDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Andrew D McCullochDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Grace C Y PengNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Stanford University · USColumbia University · USUniversity of Utah · USCardiff University · GBCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USGeorge Mason University · USMichigan State University · USNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering · USNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOShriners Hospitals for Children - St. Louis · USSwansea University · GBThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

National Biomedical Computation Resource - Competitive Revision SupplementP41GM103426 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AMARO, ROMMIE E · 2012 to 2019
$14.0M
Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
Thermally-Triggered Intra-articular Drug Delivery for OAP01AR050245 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GUILAK, FARSHID · 2003 to 2012
$11.5M
TR&D4 Spatial Modeling: Modeling Framework for Cell MotilityP41GM103313 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LOEW, LESLIE M · 2012 to 2018
$9.7M
VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES OF NORMAL AND OA CHONDRONSR01AG015768 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GUILAK, FARSHID · 1998 to 2022
$7.7M
Finite Elements For Biomechanics And BiophysicsR01GM083925 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GERARD A. ATESHIAN, JEFFREY A. WEISS · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
Tech-DevelopmentP2CHD065690 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2015 to 2019
$5.4M
Reproducibility in simulation-based prediction of natural knee mechanicsR01EB024573 · NIBIB · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI AHMET ERDEMIR, Jason Halloran · 2017 to 2026
$5.0M
Primary cilia as mechanotransducers in boneR01AR062177 · NIAMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GUO, X. EDWARD · 2012 to 2021
$3.9M
Predictive multiscale in silico cardio-pharmacologyU01HL126273 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Population-Based Shape and Biomechanical Analysis of Hip PathoanatomyR01EB016701 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANDERSON, ANDREW EDWARD · 2013 to 2023
$3.6M
Analyzing the Cardiac Power Grid: Adaptive responses to fluctuating local demandU01HL122199 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BEARD, DANIEL A, DASH, RANJAN K · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117063NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131856NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137100NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL122199NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL126273NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR050245NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR048182NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062177NIA NIH HHS R01 AG015768NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046927NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015133NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016701NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024573NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065690NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103313NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103426NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083925NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104139NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107340NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM107009NIH HHS S10 OD010707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of computational modeling for biomechanics research and related clinical care will be increasingly prominent. The biomechanics community has been developing computational models routinely for exploration of the mechanics and mechanobiology of diverse biological structures. As a result, a large array of models, data, and discipline-specific simulation software has emerged to support endeavors in computational biomechanics. Sharing computational models and related data and simulation software has first become a utilitarian interest, and now, it is a necessity. Exchange of models, in support of knowledge exchange provided by scholarly publishing, has important implications. Specifically, model sharing can facilitate assessment of reproducibility in computational biomechanics and can provide an opportunity for repurposing and reuse, and a venue for medical training. The community's desire to investigate biological and biomechanical phenomena crossing multiple systems, scales, and physical domains, also motivates sharing of modeling resources as blending of models developed by domain experts will be a required step for comprehensive simulation studies as well as the enhancement of their rigor and reproducibility. The goal of this paper is to understand current perspectives in the biomechanics community for the sharing of computational models and related resources. Opinions on opportunities, challenges, and pathways to model sharing, particularly as part of the scholarly publishing workflow, were sought. A group of journal editors and a handful of investigators active in computational biomechanics were approached to collect short opinion pieces as a part of a larger effort of the IEEE EMBS Computational Biology and the Physiome Technical Committee to address model reproducibility through publications. A synthesis of these opinion pieces indicates that the community recognizes the necessity and usefulness of model sharing. There is a strong will to facilitate model sharing, and there are corresponding initiatives by the scientific journals. Outside the publishing enterprise, infrastructure to facilitate model sharing in biomechanics exists, and simulation software developers are interested in accommodating the community's needs for sharing of modeling resources. Encouragement for the use of standardized markups, concerns related to quality assurance, acknowledgement of increased burden, and importance of stewardship of resources are noted. In the short-term, it is advisable that the community builds upon recent strategies and experiments with new pathways for continued demonstration of model sharing, its promotion, and its utility. Nonetheless, the need for a long-term strategy to unify approaches in sharing computational models and related resources is acknowledged. Development of a sustainable platform supported by a culture of open model sharing will likely evolve through continued and inclusive discussions bringing all stakeholders at the table, e.g., by possibly establishing a consortium.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMechanical PhenomenaBiomechanical Phenomena

Identifiers

PMID29247253
PMCPMC5821103
OpenAlexW2772507395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.