Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29247217›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Automated computer-based detection of encounter behaviours in groups of honeybees.

Christina Blut, Alessandro Crespi, Danielle Mersch, Laurent Keller, Linlin Zhao, Markus Kollmann, Benjamin Schellscheidt, Carsten Fülber, Martin Beye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RenderGAN: Generating Realistic Labeled Data.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Christina BlutEvolutionary Genetics, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. blut@hhu.de.
Alessandro CrespiBiorobotics Laboratory (BioRob), École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Danielle MerschNeurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Laurent KellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Linlin ZhaoMathematical Modelling of Biological Systems, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Markus KollmannMathematical Modelling of Biological Systems, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Benjamin SchellscheidtFaculty of Electrical Engineering & Information Technology, University of Applied Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Carsten FülberFaculty of Electrical Engineering & Information Technology, University of Applied Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Martin BeyeEvolutionary Genetics, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. martin.beye@hhu.de.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences · DEÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105188491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honeybees form societies in which thousands of members integrate their behaviours to act as a single functional unit. We have little knowledge on how the collaborative features are regulated by workers' activities because we lack methods that enable collection of simultaneous and continuous behavioural information for each worker bee. In this study, we introduce the Bee Behavioral Annotation System (BBAS), which enables the automated detection of bees' behaviours in small observation hives. Continuous information on position and orientation were obtained by marking worker bees with 2D barcodes in a small observation hive. We computed behavioural and social features from the tracking information to train a behaviour classifier for encounter behaviours (interaction of workers via antennation) using a machine learning-based system. The classifier correctly detected 93% of the encounter behaviours in a group of bees, whereas 13% of the falsely classified behaviours were unrelated to encounter behaviours. The possibility of building accurate classifiers for automatically annotating behaviours may allow for the examination of individual behaviours of worker bees in the social environments of small observation hives. We envisage that BBAS will be a powerful tool for detecting the effects of experimental manipulation of social attributes and sub-lethal effects of pesticides on behaviour.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsAutomation, LaboratoryBeesBehavior, AnimalData CurationDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedSocial BehaviorSoftware

Identifiers

PMID29247217
PMCPMC5732155
OpenAlexW2775772424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.