Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29247207›Full record

ReviewNutrition & diabetes2017

A rapid review examining purchasing changes resulting from fiscal measures targeted at high sugar foods and sugar-sweetened drinks.

Katharine E Roberts, Louisa J Ells, Victoria J McGowan, Theodora Machaira, Victoria C Targett, Rachel E Allen, Alison E Tedstone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition & diabetes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katharine E RobertsHealth Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London, SE1 6LH, UK. katharine.roberts@phe.gov.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5301-0497
Louisa J EllsHealth Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London, SE1 6LH, UK.
Victoria J McGowanCentre for Health Inequalities Research, Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Theodora MachairaHealth Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London, SE1 6LH, UK.
Victoria C TargettHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.
Rachel E AllenHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.
Alison E TedstoneHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To aim of the review was to examine the most recent (2010 onwards) research evidence on the health and behavioural impacts, in adults and children, of fiscal strategies that target high sugar foods and sugar-sweetened drinks (SSDs). A pragmatic rapid review was undertaken using a systematic search strategy. The review was part of a programme of work to support policy development in relation to high sugar food and SSDs. A total of 11 primary research publications were included, describing evidence from France (n = 1), the Netherlands (n = 3), and the United States of America (n = 7), assessed through a variety of study designs, with the majority in adult populations (n = 10). The evidence reviewed focused on consumer behaviour outcomes and suggested that fiscal strategies can influence purchases of high sugar products. Although the majority of studies (n = 10), including three field studies, demonstrated that an increase in the price of high sugar foods and SSDs resulted in a decrease in purchases, eight studies were conducted in a laboratory or virtual setting which may not reflect real-life situations.Findings from this review support evidence from the broader literature that suggests that fiscal measures can be effective in influencing the purchasing of high sugar foods and SSDs.

Indexed as

CommerceConsumer BehaviorHealth BehaviorCarbonated BeveragesHumansSugarsSweetening AgentsSugarsSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID29247207
PMCPMC5865540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.