Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29247203›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Host species adaptation of TLR5 signalling and flagellin recognition.

Amin Tahoun, Kirsty Jensen, Yolanda Corripio-Miyar, Sean McAteer, David G E Smith, Tom N McNeilly, David L Gally, Elizabeth J Glass

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Polysaccharides fromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Host and Species-Specificities of Pattern Recognition Receptors Upon Infection WithFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Escape of TLR5 Recognition byFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amin TahounDivision of Immunity and Infection, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Kirsty JensenDivision of Immunity and Infection, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Yolanda Corripio-MiyarDivision of Immunity and Infection, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1344-7405
Sean McAteerDivision of Immunity and Infection, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
David G E SmithMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, EH26 OPZ, UK.
Tom N McNeillyMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, EH26 OPZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6469-0512
David L GallyDivision of Immunity and Infection, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Elizabeth J GlassDivision of Immunity and Infection, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK. Liz.Glass@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6183-0185
Roslin Institute · GBHeriot-Watt University · GBKafrelsheikh University · EGMoredun Research Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I011625/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I019863/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I020519/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004227/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013740/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) recognition of flagellin instigates inflammatory signalling. Significant sequence variation in TLR5 exists between animal species but its impact on activity is less well understood. Building on our previous research that bovine TLR5 (bTLR5) is functional, we compared human and bovine TLR5 activity and signalling in cognate cell lines. bTLR5 induced higher levels of CXCL8 when expressed in bovine cells and reciprocal results were found for human TLR5 (hTLR5) in human cells, indicative of host cell specificity in this response. Analysis of Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) sequences indicated that these differential responses involve cognate MyD88 recognition. siRNA knockdowns and inhibitor experiments demonstrated that there are some host differences in signalling. Although, PI3K activation is required for bTLR5 signalling, mutating bTLR5 F798 to hTLR5 Y798 within a putative PI3K motif resulted in a significantly reduced response. All ruminants have F798 in contrast to most other species, suggesting that TLR5 signalling has evolved differently in ruminants. Evolutionary divergence between bovine and human TLR5 was also apparent in relation to responses measured to diverse bacterial flagellins. Our results underscore the importance of species specific studies and how differences may alter efficacy of TLR-based vaccine adjuvants.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionCattleCell LineFlagellinHEK293 CellsHost SpecificityHumansInterleukin-8Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesReceptors, Interleukin-1Signal TransductionSpecies SpecificityToll-Like Receptor 5FlagellinInterleukin-8Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesReceptors, Interleukin-1TLR5 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 5

Identifiers

PMID29247203
PMCPMC5732158
OpenAlexW2775117105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.