Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29246977›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2018

Temporal specificity in Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.

Matthew S Matell, Rebecca B Della Valle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Flexible control of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer based on expected reward value.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew S MatellDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5620-8316
Rebecca B Della ValleDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085, USA.

Funding

Temporal Modulation of 'Wanting' and 'Liking'R15DA039405 · NIDA · VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY · PI MATELL, MATTHEW S · 2016 to 2016
$390k
NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA039405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presentation of a previously trained Pavlovian conditioned stimulus while an organism is engaged in operant responding can moderate the rate of responding, a phenomenon known as Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer. Although it is well known that Pavlovian contingencies will generate conditioned behavior that is temporally organized with respect to the arrival of the predicted outcome, little work has examined the temporal dynamics of responding during Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. We trained rats using a fixed time 60-sec, fixed time 120-sec, or random time 60-sec schedule in an appetitive Pavlovian task, and found that presentation of the conditioned stimulus potentiated operant responding in a manner that reflected these previously established temporal expectancies. Further, this temporal specificity conformed to the scalar property as seen with other forms of interval timing behavior. Surprisingly, this effect was only seen when the conditioned stimulus was a visual cue, but not when it was an auditory cue. These data suggest that the motivational processes triggered by Pavlovian cues are not static, but fluctuate in strength as a function of temporally specific expectations of reward.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantGeneralization, PsychologicalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionCuesExtinction, PsychologicalFoodMalePhotic StimulationPsychological TestsRats, Sprague-DawleyTime FactorsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID29246977
PMCPMC5733466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.