ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2018
Technological strategies to estimate and control diffusive passage times through the mucus barrier in mucosal drug delivery.
Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- An innovative nasal nanovaccine against SARS-CoV-2 induces systemic and upper airway immunity controlling viral replication.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Silk-based biomimetic nanocomposite for precision eradication of Helicobacter pylori and gut microbiome preservation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Curcumin for inflammatory bowel disease therapy: advances in mechanisms, clinical applications, and drug delivery.Archives of pharmacal research · 2025Review
- Simulation of drug transport in airway surface liquid considering mucus flow and ciliary interaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Experimental and modeling approaches to determine drug diffusion coefficients in artificial mucus.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A First-Passage Model of Intravitreal Drug Delivery and Residence Time-Influence of Ocular Geometry, Individual Variability, and Injection Location.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Altering the viscoelastic properties of mucus-grownBiofilm · 2023Article
- The power of weak, transient interactions across biology: A paradigm of emergent behavior.Physica D. Nonlinear phenomena · 2023Article
- Replication of the Taste of Sugar by Formulation of Noncaloric Sweeteners with Mineral Salt Taste Modulator Compositions.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023Article
- Antibody protection from SARS-CoV-2 respiratory tract exposure and infection.Journal of theoretical biology · 2023Article
- MPTHub: An Open-Source Software for Characterizing the Transport of Particles in Biorelevant Media.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine learning-informed predictions of nanoparticle mobility and fate in the mucus barrier.APL bioengineering · 2022Article
- Design of ophthalmic micelles loaded with diclofenac sodium: effect of chitosan and temperature on the block-copolymer micellization behaviour.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
- Modeling insights into SARS-CoV-2 respiratory tract infections prior to immune protection.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Influenza A virus diffusion through mucus gel networks.Communications biology · 2022Article
- The Mucoadhesive Nanoparticle-Based Delivery System in the Development of Mucosal Vaccines.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Review
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Explore the Structure and Rheological Properties of Normal and Hyperconcentrated Airway Mucus.Studies in applied mathematics (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Principles of slowed hydrogen diffusion through a mucus layer.Physical review. E · 2021Article
- Functionalized Particles Designed for Targeted Delivery.Polymers · 2021Review
- ENHANCED ELECTRODIFFUSIVE TRANSPORT ACROSS A MUCUS LAYER.SIAM journal on applied mathematics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In mucosal drug delivery, two design goals are desirable: 1) insure drug passage through the mucosal barrier to the epithelium prior to drug removal from the respective organ via mucus clearance; and 2) design carrier particles to achieve a prescribed arrival time and drug uptake schedule at the epithelium. Both goals are achievable if one can control "one-sided" diffusive passage times of drug carrier particles: from deposition at the mucus interface, through the mucosal barrier, to the epithelium. The passage time distribution must be, with high confidence, shorter than the timescales of mucus clearance to maximize drug uptake. For 100nm and smaller drug-loaded nanoparticulates, as well as pure drug powders or drug solutions, diffusion is normal (i.e., Brownian) and rapid, easily passing through the mucosal barrier prior to clearance. Major challenges in quantitative control over mucosal drug delivery lie with larger drug-loaded nanoparticulates that are comparable to or larger than the pores within the mucus gel network, for which diffusion is not simple Brownian motion and typically much less rapid; in these scenarios, a timescale competition ensues between particle passage through the mucus barrier and mucus clearance from the organ. In the lung, as a primary example, coordinated cilia and air drag continuously transport mucus toward the trachea, where mucus and trapped cargo are swallowed into the digestive tract. Mucus clearance times in lung airways range from minutes to hours or significantly longer depending on deposition in the upper, middle, lower airways and on lung health, giving a wide time window for drug-loaded particle design to achieve controlled delivery to the epithelium. We review the physical and chemical factors (of both particles and mucus) that dictate particle diffusion in mucus, and the technological strategies (theoretical and experimental) required to achieve the design goals. First we describe an idealized scenario - a homogeneous viscous fluid of uniform depth with a particle undergoing passive normal diffusion - where the theory of Brownian motion affords the ability to rigorously specify particle size distributions to meet a prescribed, one-sided, diffusive passage time distribution. Furthermore, we describe how the theory of Brownian motion provides the scaling of one-sided diffusive passage times with respect to mucus viscosity and layer depth, and under reasonable caveats, one can also prescribe passage time scaling due to heterogeneity in viscosity and layer depth. Small-molecule drugs and muco-inert, drug-loaded carrier particles 100nm and smaller fall into this class of rigorously controllable passage times for drug delivery. Second we describe the prevalent scenarios in which drug-loaded carrier particles in mucus violate simple Brownian motion, instead exhibiting anomalous sub-diffusion, for which all theoretical control over diffusive passage times is lost, and experiments are prohibitive if not impossible to measure one-sided passage times. We then discuss strategies to overcome these roadblocks, requiring new particle-tracking experiments and emerging advances in theory and computation of anomalous, sub-diffusive processes that are necessary to predict and control one-sided particle passage times from deposition at the mucosal interface to epithelial uptake. We highlight progress to date, remaining hurdles, and prospects for achieving the two design goals for 200nm and larger, drug-loaded, non-dissolving, nanoparticulates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.