Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29246519›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2017

Hybrid Method Based on Information Gain and Support Vector Machine for Gene Selection in Cancer Classification.

Lingyun Gao, Mingquan Ye, Xiaojie Lu, Daobin Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Artificial Intelligence and Precision Medicine: A Perspective.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cancer Classification with a Cost-Sensitive Naive Bayes Stacking Ensemble.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lingyun GaoSchool of Medical Information, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002, China.
Mingquan YeSchool of Medical Information, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002, China. Electronic address: ymq@wnmc.edu.cn.
Xiaojie LuSchool of Medical Information, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002, China.
Daobin HuangSchool of Medical Information, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains a great challenge to achieve sufficient cancer classification accuracy with the entire set of genes, due to the high dimensions, small sample size, and big noise of gene expression data. We thus proposed a hybrid gene selection method, Information Gain-Support Vector Machine (IG-SVM) in this study. IG was initially employed to filter irrelevant and redundant genes. Then, further removal of redundant genes was performed using SVM to eliminate the noise in the datasets more effectively. Finally, the informative genes selected by IG-SVM served as the input for the LIBSVM classifier. Compared to other related algorithms, IG-SVM showed the highest classification accuracy and superior performance as evaluated using five cancer gene expression datasets based on a few selected genes. As an example, IG-SVM achieved a classification accuracy of 90.32% for colon cancer, which is difficult to be accurately classified, only based on three genes including CSRP1, MYL9, and GUCA2B.

Indexed as

Genes, NeoplasmSupport Vector MachineComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsCancer classificationGene selectionInformation gainSmall sample size with high dimensionSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID29246519
PMCPMC5828665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.