Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29246476›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

Willingness to accept a future influenza A(H7N9) vaccine in Beijing, China.

Shuangsheng Wu, Jianting Su, Peng Yang, Haiyan Zhang, Hongjun Li, Yanhui Chu, Weiyu Hua, Chao Li, Yaqing Tang, Quanyi Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: knowledge and beliefs.Bulletin of the National Research Centre · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuangsheng WuBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China; Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jianting SuBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China; Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Peng YangBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China; Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China; School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: yangpengcdc@163.com.
Haiyan ZhangDongcheng District Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
Hongjun LiTongzhou District Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
Yanhui ChuXicheng District Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
Weiyu HuaHaidian District Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
Chao LiHuairou District Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
Yaqing TangChangping District Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.
Quanyi WangBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China; Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China. Electronic address: bjcdcxm@126.com.
Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aimed to estimate residents' willingness to accept a future H7N9 vaccine and its determinants in the general adult population in Beijing, China.

methodsWe conducted a multi-stage sampling, cross-sectional survey using self-administered anonymous questionnaires from May to June, in 2014. The main outcome variable was residents' willingness to accept a future H7N9 vaccine. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of vaccination willingness.

resultsOf the 7264 eligible participants, 14.5% of Beijing residents reported that they had not heard of H7N9. Among those who had heard of H7N9, 59.5% of the general adult population would be willing to accept a future H7N9 vaccine, and approximately half of them reported 'I am afraid of being infected by H7N9' and 'H7N9 vaccine can prevent infections', and 28.1% reported 'my daily life is affected by H7N9'. The variables that were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of reporting willingness were being younger adults (aged 18-29 years: OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17-1.97; aged 30-39 years: OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.08-1.78), being farmers (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.32-1.96), being unemployed people (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.04-1.78), living in suburban areas (OR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.89-2.51), having ≥2 children in the family (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.03-1.92), perceived risk in China (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.15-1.48), perceived susceptibility to disease (OR = 3.13; 95% CI: 2.73-3.58), perceived negative effect on daily life (OR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.13-1.55), perceived effectiveness of vaccination (OR = 2.34; 95% CI: 2.07-2.64), and recent uptake of influenza vaccine (OR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.92-2.66).

conclusionsA great number of Beijing residents had doubts about the vaccine's effectiveness and were not concerned about disease risk, which were the factors affecting willingness to be vaccinated. Targeted education programs on disease risk as well as vaccine's effectiveness are needed to improve the willingness of vaccination for potential H7N9 pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

Influenza VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedBeijingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceSurveys and QuestionnairesInfluenza VaccinesChinaInfluenzaInfluenza A (H7N9)PandemicVaccine

Identifiers

PMID29246476
PMCPMC7115431
OpenAlexW2771167894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.