Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29246314›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2017

Characterization and Molecular Mechanism of Peptide-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticle Inhibiting p53-HDM2 Interaction in Retinoblastoma.

Sushma Kalmodia, Sowmya Parameswaran, Kalaivani Ganapathy, Wenrong Yang, Colin J Barrow, Jagat R Kanwar, Kislay Roy, Madavan Vasudevan, Kirti Kulkarni, Sailaja V Elchuri and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. State of the art in pediatric nanomedicines.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Nanotechnology for Pediatric Retinoblastoma Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cancer management and research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sushma KalmodiaDepartment of Nano Biotechnology, Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, 18, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006, India; Centre for Chemistry and Biotechnology, Deakin University, Geelong Campus, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia.
Sowmya ParameswaranRadheshyam Kanoi Stem Cell Laboratory, Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, 18, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006, India.
Kalaivani GanapathyDepartment of Nano Biotechnology, Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, 18, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006, India.
Wenrong YangCentre for Chemistry and Biotechnology, Deakin University, Geelong Campus, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia.
Colin J BarrowCentre for Chemistry and Biotechnology, Deakin University, Geelong Campus, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia.
Jagat R KanwarNanomedicine -Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Biomedical Research (NLIMBR), School of Medicine (SoM), Centre for Molecular and Medicine Research (C-MMR), Deakin University, Geelong Campus, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3217, Australia.
Kislay RoyNanomedicine -Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Biomedical Research (NLIMBR), School of Medicine (SoM), Centre for Molecular and Medicine Research (C-MMR), Deakin University, Geelong Campus, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3217, Australia.
Madavan VasudevanBionivid Technologies, Bangalore 560043, India.
Kirti KulkarniBionivid Technologies, Bangalore 560043, India.
Sailaja V ElchuriDepartment of Nano Biotechnology, Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, 18, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006, India.
Subramanian KrishnakumarDepartment of Nano Biotechnology, Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, 18, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006, India. Electronic address: drkk@snmail.org.
Sankara Nethralaya · INDeakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of the interaction between p53 and HDM2 is an effective therapeutic strategy in cancers that harbor a wild-type p53 protein such as retinoblastoma (RB). Nanoparticle-based delivery of therapeutic molecules has been shown to be advantageous in localized delivery, including to the eye, by overcoming ocular barriers. In this study, we utilized biocompatible gold nanoparticles (GNPs) to deliver anti-HDM2 peptide to RB cells. Characterization studies suggested that GNP-HDM2 was stable in biologically relevant solvents and had optimal cellular internalization capability, the primary requirement of any therapeutic molecule. GNP-HDM2 treatment in RB cells in vitro suggested that they function by arresting RB cells at the G2M phase of the cell cycle and initiating apoptosis. Analysis of molecular changes in GNP-HDM2-treated cells by qRT-PCR and western blotting revealed that the p53 protein was upregulated; however, transactivation of its downstream targets was minimal, except for the PUMA-BCl2 and Bax axis. Global gene expression and in silico bioinformatic analysis of GNP-HDM2-treated cells suggested that upregulation of p53 might presumptively mediate apoptosis through the induction of p53-inducible miRNAs.

Indexed as

apoptosiscell cyclegene expressiongold nanoparticleshuman double minute 2in silicomolecular mechanismp53peptideretinoblastoma

Identifiers

PMID29246314
PMCPMC5684491
OpenAlexW2766604381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.