Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29246215›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2017

Oral cancer screening practices of oral health professionals in Australia.

Rodrigo Mariño, Satoru Haresaku, Roisin McGrath, Denise Bailey, Michael Mccullough, Ross Musolino, Boaz Kim, Alagesan Chinnassamy, Michael Morgan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The ISAC Paradigm to Tame Oral Cancer in Saudi Arabia: A Quasi-experimental Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Overview of common oral lesions.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo MariñoOral Health Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. r.marino@unimelb.edu.au.
Satoru HaresakuDepartment of Public Health & Human Sciences, Preventive & Public Health Dentistry, Fukuoka Dental College, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Roisin McGrathOral Health Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Denise BaileyOral Health Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Michael McculloughMelbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ross MusolinoeviDent Foundation, South Yarra, Australia.
Boaz KimUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Alagesan ChinnassamyUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael MorganOral Health Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUFukuoka Dental College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate oral cancer-related screening practices of Oral Health Professionals (OHPs - dentists, dental hygienists, dental therapists, and oral health therapists) practising in Victoria, Australia.

methodsA 36-item survey was distributed to 3343 OHPs. Items included socio-demographic and work-related characteristics; self-assessed knowledge of oral cancer; perceived level of confidence in discussing oral health behaviors with patients; oral cancer screening practices; and self-evaluated need for additional training on screening procedures for oral cancer.

resultsA total of 380 OHPs responded this survey, achieving an overall response rate of 9.4%. Forty-five were excluded from further analysis. Of these 335 OHP, 72% were dentists; (n = 241); either GDP or Dental Specialists; 13.7% (n = 46) were dental hygienists; 12.2% (n = 41) were oral health therapists, and the remaining 2.1% (n = 7) were dental therapists. While the majority (95.2%) agreed that oral cancer screening should be routinely performed, in actual practice around half (51.4%) screened all their patients. Another 12.8% "Very rarely" conducted screening examinations. The probability of routinely conducting an oral cancer screening was explored utilising Logistic Regression Analysis. Four variables remained statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Results indicate that the likelihood of conducting an oral cancer screening rose with increasing levels of OHPs' confidence in oral cancer-related knowledge (OR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.09-1.67) and with higher levels of confidence in discussing oral hygiene practices with patients (OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.03-1.52). Results also showed that dental specialists were less likely to perform oral cancer screening examinations compared with other OHPs (OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07-0.52) and the likelihood of performing an oral cancer screening decreased when the "patient complained of a problem" (OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.10-0.44).

conclusionOnly half the study sample performed oral cancer screening examinations for all of their patients. This study provides evidence of the need for further oral cancer-related education and screening training for OHPs, which is vital to enhance oral cancer prevention and early detection.

Indexed as

Dental AuxiliariesDentistsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMouth NeoplasmsOral HealthProfessional PracticeSurveys and QuestionnairesVictoriaAustraliaOral cancerOral health professionalsScreening practicesSelf-confidence

Identifiers

PMID29246215
PMCPMC5732389
OpenAlexW2774461979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.