Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29246213›Full record

ReviewBMC medical education2017

The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review.

Desirée Kozlowski, Marie Hutchinson, John Hurley, Joanne Rowley, Joanna Sutherland

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05235035 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Sleep Misalignment on the Cognitive Empathetic Ability to Recognize Pain and to Evaluate the Pain Intensity in Others as Competence for Qualitative Care

TypeobservationalSponsorClaude Bernard UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsEmpathy, Sleep, PainArmsNight shift work
NCT05364801 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Anxiety on the Decision-making Process of Anesthesiologists in the Choice of Drugs for Induction of General Anesthesia of Patients With Aspiration Risk Factors

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRan2022 to 2024Enrolled500ConditionsAnxiety, Decision Making, General AnesthesiaArmsSurvey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Desirée KozlowskiDiscipline of Psychology, School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Hogbin Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia. Desiree.Kozlowski@scu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3919-2428
Marie HutchinsonSchool of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Hogbin Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia.
John HurleySchool of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Hogbin Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia.
Joanne RowleySchool of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Hogbin Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia.
Joanna SutherlandSchool of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Hogbin Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia.
Southern Cross University · AU

Funding

Southern Cross University 153500.nnnn.31680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, clinical decision making has been perceived as a purely rational and cognitive process. Recently, a number of authors have linked emotional intelligence (EI) to clinical decision making (CDM) and calls have been made for an increased focus on EI skills for clinicians. The objective of this integrative literature review was to identify and synthesise the empirical evidence for a role of emotion in CDM.

methodsA systematic search of the bibliographic databases PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted to identify empirical studies of clinician populations. Search terms were focused to identify studies reporting clinician emotion OR clinician emotional intelligence OR emotional competence AND clinical decision making OR clinical reasoning.

resultsTwenty three papers were retained for synthesis. These represented empirical work from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches and comprised work with a focus on experienced emotion and on skills associated with emotional intelligence. The studies examined nurses (10), physicians (7), occupational therapists (1), physiotherapists (1), mixed clinician samples (3), and unspecified infectious disease experts (1). We identified two main themes in the context of clinical decision making: the subjective experience of emotion; and, the application of emotion and cognition in CDM. Sub-themes under the subjective experience of emotion were: emotional response to contextual pressures; emotional responses to others; and, intentional exclusion of emotion from CDM. Under the application of emotion and cognition in CDM, sub-themes were: compassionate emotional labour - responsiveness to patient emotion within CDM; interdisciplinary tension regarding the significance and meaning of emotion in CDM; and, emotion and moral judgement.

conclusionsClinicians' experienced emotions can and do affect clinical decision making, although acknowledgement of that is far from universal. Importantly, this occurs in the in the absence of a clear theoretical framework and educational preparation may not reflect the importance of emotional competence to effective CDM.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingEmotional IntelligenceEmotionsHumansInterviews as TopicNursesOccupational TherapistsPhysical TherapistsPhysiciansQualitative ResearchClinical decision makingClinical reasoningEmotionEmotional intelligence

Identifiers

PMID29246213
PMCPMC5732402
OpenAlexW2773758960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.