SynthesisMedicine2017
Endometriosis-associated malignant transformation in abdominal surgical scar: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scar endometriosis, a form of abdominal wall endometriosis-a neglected obstetrical complication?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Associations between serum vitamin D and the risk of female reproductive tumors: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Article
- Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Abdominal Wall: An Aggressive Endometriosis-Associated Malignant Disease.Cureus · 2026Article
- Appendiceal intussusception due to endometriosis: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Not Just a Bleeding Scar: The Mystery of Cesarean Scar Endometriosis.Indian dermatology online journal · 2025Article
- Rare abdominal wall clear cell carcinoma in endometriosis: case report and literature review of diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Rectus Abdominis Muscle Endometriosis: A Unique Case Report with a Literature Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Brown Umbilical Nodule: A Case of Primary Cutaneous Endometriosis.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Management of Endometriosis in Menopause: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Malignancy in Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Is There a Way to Avoid It? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Surgical Scar Endometriosis: An Emerging Enigma.Cureus · 2023Article
- Mass-like extragonadal endometriosis associated malignant transformation in the pelvis: A rare case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Use of wire guided localization for resection of recurrent, oligometastatic gynecologic clear cell carcinoma to anterior abdominal wall.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Article
- Clear cell carcinoma of the abdominal wall: A case report with a review of the literature.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- [S2k guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis-Recommendations for pathology].Der Pathologe · 2022Review
- Extrapelvic endometriosis located individually in the rectus abdominis muscle: a rare cause of chronic pelvic pain (a case report).The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Localized endometrioid cancer in the abdominal wall with synchronous early-stage endometrial cancerTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Article
- Review
- Clear-cell carcinoma originating from cesarean section scar: two case reports.Journal of medical case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometriosis-associated malignant transformation in abdominal surgical scar (EAMTAS) is a very rare and aggressive phenomenon. Our current article aims to provide a clinical overview, focusing on risk factors affecting survival.
methodsWe performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review based on prior reviews and case reports regarding the phenomenon published as abstracts in English, from January 1980 to November 2016. Overall, we identified 47 cases, and we included another case from our institution. We further contacted previous investigators to receive updated follow-up regarding their patients. We analyzed the data, focusing on risk factors that might affect overall survival.
resultsAll the patients reported in the literature had a uterine surgery, mainly caesarean section. The median time-lag from first surgery to the diagnosis of cancer was about 19 years. Clear-cell carcinoma (CCC) was the most prevalent histology (67%), followed by endometrioid adenocarcinoma (15%). Most of the patients were treated by extensive surgery and chemotherapy and/or radiation. Overall 5 years survival was about 40%. Median overall survival was 42 months (95% confidence interval of [18.7, 65.3]). Although our review is currently the largest in the literature, we cannot draw any statistical significant results due to the limited number of patients reported. According to univariate Cox-regression models, a tendency toward worse prognosis was shown for 3-year disease-free survival clear cell histologic-type (P = .169), and tumor diameter ≥8 cm in nonclear-cell histology, 18 months postdiagnosis (P = .06).
conclusionEAMTAS is a rare and aggressive disease. It is mostly related to cesarean section scars and is diagnosed many years postsurgery. Clear-cell histology tends to endure from the worse prognosis. The treatment is mainly extensive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.