ArticleMedicine2017
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of unusual phenotype after imatinib treatment: A case report and diagnostic utility of ETV1 mRNA in situ hybridization.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting prognostic biomarkers in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: the potential role of ETV1 polymorphisms.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of MET-variant digestive tract tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Prognostic value ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Development and characterization of an ETV1 rabbit monoclonal antibody for the immunohistochemical detection of ETV1 expression in cancer tissue specimens.Journal of immunological methods · 2023Article
- A case report of gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the duodenum.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With Chondrosarcomatous Dedifferentiation Following Imatinib Therapy.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleGastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common tumor of mesenchymal origin in gastrointestinal tract. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining combined with a typical morphology is used for the diagnosis of GIST. Typically, IHC staining for v-kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene (KIT) and discovered on GIST-1(DOG1) is positive in almost all GISTs. However, imatinib mesylate, a specific inhibitor of KIT tyrosine kinase, frequently involves changes in the morphology and IHC staining of GIST, impeding the diagnosis. Recently, in situ hybridization (ISH) for E26 transformation-specific sequence variant 1 (ETV1) mRNA was introduced as a useful marker to diagnose GIST. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report 2 cases of gastric GIST, which expressed unusual phenotypes after imatinib therapy. DIAGNOSES: The first patient was found to have a gastric subepithelial tumor in gastroduodenoscopy done for regular checkup. In biopsy of the tumor, it showed homogenous spindle cells that were positive to standard IHC markers for GIST. The second patient visited our hospital because of a palpable mass in the abdomen. In abdominal computed tomography (CT), a tumor arising from the stomach was found. A needle biopsy was done and the patient was diagnosed of gastric GIST because the biopsy showed spindle cells positive to typical IHC markers for GIST. After imatinib treatment, in both patients, the resected tumors were composed of heterogeneous spindle cells negative to KIT, DOG1, and CD34 IHC staining, which was unusual for GIST. However, ISH for ETV1 mRNA done for both biopsied and resected tumors was positive, even after imatinib treatment. A molecular analysis found a mutation in exon 11 of KIT gene before and after imatinib therapy in both patients, confirming the diagnosis of GIST.
interventionsBoth patients took neoadjuvant imatinib treatment, and afterwards, underwent a surgical resection. OUTCOMES: The patients remain on imatinib treatment and no progression or recurrence has been detected to date. LESSONS: ISH for ETV1 mRNA is a useful technique in diagnosing GIST when IHC with KIT, DOG1, or CD34 fail to stain positive after imatinib therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.