ArticleMedicine2017
Gastroenteropancreatic-origin neuroendocrine carcinomas: Three case reports with favorable responses following localized radiotherapy and a review of literature.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Adaptive Tomotherapy for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: Case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleThe radiotherapy (RT) responses of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-origin neuroendocrine tumors remain unclear. We report cases of favorable response after localized RT of GEP-origin neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs). PATIENT CONCERNS: 1. An 82-year-old male presented with a lower esophageal mass. Positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) scan showed a lower esophageal mass and gastrohepatic lymph nodes. 2. A 52-year-old female presented with abdominal discomfort. CT scan showed a 9.8 cm-sized enhancing mass in the lesser sac abutting the stomach, pancreas and liver. 3. A 54-year-old male patient presented with anal pain and bleeding. CT scan showed a remnant mass in the perirectal area after trans-anal excision. DIAGNOSES: The diagnoses of GEP-NECs were pathologically confirmed by biopsy or excision, and immunohistochemical stainings of Ki-67, CD56, synaptophysin and chromogranin-A.
interventions1. The patient was treated with definitive RT. 2. The patient was treated with RT after two cycles of etoposide-cisplatin chemotherapy. 3. The patient was treated with adjuvant RT. OUTCOMES: 1. Complete remission was achieved based on CT scan four months after RT. 2. CT scan showed partial regression of the mass with a 5 cm-diameter at six months after RT. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered after RT. 3. The residual mass was almost completely regressed at CT scan four months after RT. LESSONS: In cases of GEP-NECs, RT can be a useful treatment modality with favorable tumor response for patients with inoperable conditions or those suffering from bulky tumor masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.