Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29245269›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2017

Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ha Yeon Kim, Ja Eun Lee, Ha Yan Kim, Jeongmin Kim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04839536 (A Comparative Study of Sevoflurane Sedation With TCI Propofol Sedation in Dialysis Dependent End Stage Renal Failure Patients for Transposition of Brachiocephalic Fistula Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04839536 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Study of Sevoflurane Sedation With TCI Propofol Sedation in Dialysis Dependent End Stage Renal Failure Patients for Transposition of Brachiocephalic Fistula Repair

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled36ConditionsSevoflurane, Kidney Diseases, Procedural HypotensionArmsSevoflurane inhalant product
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Inhaled sevoflurane in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inhaled Anesthetics: Beyond the Operating Room.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Inhaled volatile anesthetics in the intensive care unit.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ha Yeon KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Biostatistics Collaboration Unit Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ja Eun Lee
Ha Yan Kim
Jeongmin Kim
Sungkyunkwan University · KRMRC Biostatistics Unit · GBYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVolatile sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) may reduce the number of adverse events and improve patient outcomes compared with intravenous (IV) sedation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of volatile and IV sedation in adult ICU patients.

methodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and Web of Science databases for all randomized trials comparing volatile sedation using an anesthetic-conserving device (ACD) with IV sedation in terms of awakening and extubation times, lengths of ICU and hospital stay, and pharmacologic end-organ effects.

resultsThirteen trials with a total of 1027 patients were included. Volatile sedation (sevoflurane or isoflurane) administered through an ACD shortened the awakening time [mean difference (MD), -80.0 minutes; 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), -134.5 to -25.6; P = .004] and extubation time (MD, -196.0 minutes; 95% CIs, -305.2 to -86.8; P < .001) compared with IV sedation (midazolam or propofol). No differences in the lengths of ICU and hospital stay were noted between the 2 groups. In the analysis of cardiac effects of sedation from 5 studies, patients who received volatile sedation showed lower serum troponin levels 6 hours after ICU admission than patients who received IV sedation (P < .05). The effect size of troponin was largest between 12 and 24 hours after ICU admission (MD, -0.27 μg/L; 95% CIs, -0.44 to -0.09; P = .003).

conclusionCompared with IV sedation, volatile sedation administered through an ACD in the ICU shortened the awakening and extubation times. Considering the difference in serum troponin levels between both arms, volatile anesthetics might have a myocardial protective effect after cardiac surgery even at a subanesthetic dose. Because the included studies used small sample sizes with high heterogeneity, further large, high-quality prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAirway ExtubationAnesthetics, InhalationHumansIsofluraneLength of StayMethyl EthersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSevofluraneAnesthetics, InhalationIsofluraneMethyl EthersSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID29245269
PMCPMC5728884
OpenAlexW2773054631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.