Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29244906›Full record

ArticleDepression and anxiety2018

Finding treatment-resistant depression in real-world data: How a data-driven approach compares with expert-based heuristics.

M Soledad Cepeda, Jenna Reps, Daniel Fife, Clair Blacketer, Paul Stang, Patrick Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Depression and anxiety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Rethinking the Treatment-Resistant Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmaco-Multiomics: A New Frontier in Precision Psychiatry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antidepressant discontinuation in treatment resistant depression.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Soledad CepedaJanssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5159-6217
Jenna RepsJanssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Daniel FifeJanssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Clair BlacketerJanssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Paul StangJanssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Patrick RyanJanssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression that does not respond to antidepressants is treatment-resistant depression (TRD). TRD definitions include assessments of treatment response, dose and duration, and implementing these definitions in claims databases can be challenging. We built a data-driven TRD definition and evaluated its performance.

methodsWe included adults with depression, ≥1 antidepressant, and no diagnosis of mania, dementia, or psychosis. Subjects were stratified into those with and without proxy for TRD. Proxies for TRD were electroconvulsive therapy, deep brain, or vagus nerve stimulation. The index date for subjects with proxy for TRD was the procedure date, and for subjects without, the date of a randomly selected visit. We used three databases. We fit decision tree predictive models. We included number of distinct antidepressants, with and without adequate doses and duration, number of antipsychotics and psychotherapies, and expert-based definitions, 3, 6, and 12 months before index date. To assess performance, we calculated area under the curve (AUC) and transportability.

resultsWe analyzed 33,336 subjects with no proxy for TRD, and 3,566 with the proxy. Number of antidepressants and antipsychotics were selected in all periods. The best model was at 12 months with an AUC = 0.81. The rule transported well and states that a subject with ≥1 antipsychotic or ≥3 antidepressants in the last year has TRD. Applying this rule, 15.8% of subjects treated for depression had TRD.

conclusionThe definition that best discriminates between subjects with and without TRD considers number of distinct antidepressants (≥3) or antipsychotics (≥1) in the last year.

Indexed as

HeuristicsAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic Agentsdatabasesdecision treeepidemiologymachine learningprevalence

Identifiers

PMID29244906
PMCPMC5873404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.