ArticlePloS one2017
FGMD: A novel approach for functional gene module detection in cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational inference of co-regulatory modules from transcription factors, MicroRNAs, and their targets using CanMod2.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- A rectified factor network based biclustering method for detecting cancer-related coding genes and miRNAs, and their interactions.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing availability of multi-dimensional biological datasets for the same samples (i.e., gene expression, microRNAs, copy numbers, mutations, methylations), it has now become possible to systematically understand the regulatory mechanisms operating in a cancer cell. For this task, it is important to discover a set of co-expressed genes with functions, representing a so-called functional gene module, because co-expressed genes tend to be co-regulated by the same regulators, including transcription factors, microRNAs, and copy number aberrations. Several algorithms have been used to identify such gene modules, including hierarchical clustering and non-negative matrix factorization. Although these algorithms have been applied to many microarray datasets, only a few systematic analyses of these algorithms have been performed for RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) data to date. Although gene expression levels determined based on microarray and RNA-Seq datasets tend to be highly correlated, the expression levels of some genes differ depending on the platforms used for analysis, which may result in the construction of different gene modules for the same samples. Here, we compare several module detection algorithms applied to both microarray and RNA-seq datasets. We further propose a new functional gene module detection algorithm (FGMD), which is based on a hierarchical clustering algorithm that was modified to reflect actual biological observations, including the fact that a single gene may be involved in multiple biological pathways. Application of existing algorithms and the new FGMD algorithm to breast cancer and ovarian cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas showed that the FGMD algorithm had the best performance for most of the functional pathway enrichment tests and in the transcription factor enrichment test. We expect that the FGMD algorithm will contribute to improving the identification of functional gene modules related to cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.