Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29244072›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

Impact of prediagnostic smoking and smoking cessation on colorectal cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from cohorts within the CHANCES consortium.

J M Ordóñez-Mena, V Walter, B Schöttker, M Jenab, M G O'Doherty, F Kee, B Bueno-de-Mesquita, P H M Peeters, B H Stricker, R Ruiter and 16 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association between smoking and colorectal cancer in Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pre- and Postnatal Exposures to Tobacco Smoking and Survival of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic and Myeloid Leukemias in California, United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Small-Area Geographic and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer in Cyprus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Smoking-induced microbial dysbiosis in health and disease.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

J M Ordóñez-MenaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
V WalterDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: v.walter@dkfz.de.
B SchöttkerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Health Care and Social Sciences, FOM University, Essen, Germany.
M JenabInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
M G O'DohertyUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queens University of Belfast, Belfast, UK.
F KeeUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Queens University of Belfast, Belfast, UK.
B Bueno-de-MesquitaDepartment of Chronic Diseases, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
P H M PeetersDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B H StrickerDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R RuiterDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A HofmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
S SöderbergDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Cardiology, and Heart Center, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
P JousilahtiNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
K KuulasmaaNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
N D FreedmanMetabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, USA.
T WilsgaardDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
A WolkInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
L M NilssonNutritional Research, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Arcum, Arctic Research Centre at Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
A TjønnelandDiet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J R QuirósPublic Health Directorate, Asturias, Spain.
F J B van DuijnhovenDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
P D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
P BoffettaHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
A TrichopoulouHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece; WHO Collaborating Center for Nutrition and Health, Unit of Nutritional Epidemiology and Nutrition in Public Health, Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
H BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Consortium on Health and Ageing: Network of Cohorts in Europe and the United States (CHANCES)

Funding

Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer in the AARP CohortZIACP010196 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SINHA, RASHMI · 2009 to 2025
$21.0M
World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Smoking has been associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in previous studies and might also be associated with prognosis after CRC diagnosis. However, current evidence on smoking in association with CRC prognosis is limited. Patients and methods: For this individual patient data meta-analysis, sociodemographic and smoking behavior information of 12 414 incident CRC patients (median age at diagnosis: 64.3 years), recruited within 14 prospective cohort studies among previously cancer-free adults, was collected at baseline and harmonized across studies. Vital status and causes of death were collected for a mean follow-up time of 5.1 years following cancer diagnosis. Associations of smoking behavior with overall and CRC-specific survival were evaluated using Cox regression and standard meta-analysis methodology. Results: A total of 5229 participants died, 3194 from CRC. Cox regression revealed significant associations between former [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.20] and current smoking (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.04-1.60) and poorer overall survival compared with never smoking. Compared with current smoking, smoking cessation was associated with improved overall (HR<10 years = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.69-0.88; HR≥10 years = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.63-0.97) and CRC-specific survival (HR≥10 years = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.67-0.85). Conclusion: In this large meta-analysis including primary data of incident CRC patients from 14 prospective cohort studies on the association between smoking and CRC prognosis, former and current smoking were associated with poorer CRC prognosis compared with never smoking. Smoking cessation was associated with improved survival when compared with current smokers. Future studies should further quantify the benefits of nonsmoking, both for cancer prevention and for improving survival among CRC patients, in particular also in terms of treatment response.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSmokingSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID29244072
PMCPMC6075220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.