Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29243663›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018

Characterization of Compton-scatter imaging with an analytical simulation method.

Kevin C Jones, Gage Redler, Alistair Templeton, Damian Bernard, Julius V Turian, James C H Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MR-linac is the best modality for lung SBRT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin C JonesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8530-1931
Gage RedlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States of America.
Alistair TempletonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States of America.
Damian BernardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States of America.
Julius V TurianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States of America.
James C H ChuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States of America.

Funding

Scatter imaging for stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung cancerR21CA213407 · NCI · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHU, JAMES C.H. · 2017 to 2018
$347k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA213407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By collimating the photons scattered when a megavoltage therapy beam interacts with the patient, a Compton-scatter image may be formed without the delivery of an extra dose. To characterize and assess the potential of the technique, an analytical model for simulating scatter images was developed and validated against Monte Carlo (MC). For three phantoms, the scatter images collected during irradiation with a 6 MV flattening-filter-free therapy beam were simulated. Images, profiles, and spectra were compared for different phantoms and different irradiation angles. The proposed analytical method simulates accurate scatter images up to 1000 times faster than MC. Minor differences between MC and analytical simulated images are attributed to limitations in the isotropic superposition/convolution algorithm used to analytically model multiple-order scattering. For a detector placed at 90° relative to the treatment beam, the simulated scattered photon energy spectrum peaks at 140-220 keV, and 40-50% of the photons are the result of multiple scattering. The high energy photons originate at the beam entrance. Increasing the angle between source and detector increases the average energy of the collected photons and decreases the relative contribution of multiple scattered photons. Multiple scattered photons cause blurring in the image. For an ideal 5 mm diameter pinhole collimator placed 18.5 cm from the isocenter, 10 cGy of deposited dose (2 Hz imaging rate for 1200 MU min

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingPhotonsHumansLung NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedScattering, RadiationTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID29243663
PMCPMC5849266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.