Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29243562›Full record

ReviewWestern journal of nursing research2019

Measurement and Outcomes of the Perceived Risk of Stroke: A Review.

Dawn M Aycock, Patricia C Clark, Semere Araya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Western journal of nursing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Perceptions of recurrence risk and behavioural changes among first-ever and recurrent stroke survivors: A qualitative analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dawn M Aycock1 Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-2633
Patricia C Clark1 Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Semere Araya1 Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Stroke Counseling for Risk Reduction in Young Adult African AmericansK01NR015494 · NINR · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AYCOCK, DAWN MAREE · 2015 to 2017
$278k
NINR NIH HHS K01 NR015494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke continues to be a public health problem, and risk perceptions are key to understanding people's thoughts about stroke risk and their preventive health behaviors. This review identifies how the perceived risk of stroke has been measured and outcomes in terms of levels, predictors, accuracy, and intervention results. Sixteen studies were included. The perceived risk of stroke has primarily been assessed with single-item measures; no multi-item surveys were found. In general, people tend to perceive a low-moderate risk of stroke; the most common predictors of higher stroke risk perceptions were having risk factors for stroke (hypertension, diabetes) and a higher number of risk factors. However, inaccuracies were common; at least half of respondents underestimated/overestimated their risk. Few studies have examined whether interventions can improve the perceived risk of stroke. Strategies to improve stroke risk perceptions should be explored to determine whether accuracy can promote healthy lifestyles to reduce stroke risk.

Indexed as

PerceptionWeights and MeasuresHealth BehaviorHumansPsychometricsRisk AssessmentStrokebehavior changemeasurementrisk perceptionstroke

Identifiers

PMID29243562
PMCPMC5984120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.