ArticleJournal of anatomy2018
Predicting calvarial growth in normal and craniosynostotic mice using a computational approach.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimising Fronto-Orbital Distraction for Management of Unicoronal Craniosynostosis.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Unravelling the difference in craniofacial morphology of Yucatan miniature and standard pigs during postnatal ontogeny.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Towards a radiation free numerical modelling framework to predict spring assisted correction of scaphocephaly.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Article
- Cranial suture lineage and contributions to repair of the mouse skull.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Synchondrosis fusion contributes to the progression of postnatal craniofacial dysmorphology in syndromic craniosynostosis.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- Mechanical loading of cranial joints minimizes the craniofacial phenotype in Crouzon syndrome.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Extracellular Matrix in Human Craniofacial Development.Journal of dental research · 2022Review
- Mouse embryo phenotyping using X-ray microCT.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- A Computational Framework to Predict Calvarial Growth: Optimising Management of Sagittal Craniosynostosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Predicting and comparing three corrective techniques for sagittal craniosynostosis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Using Sensitivity Analysis to Develop a Validated Computational Model of Post-operative Calvarial Growth in Sagittal Craniosynostosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Predicting calvarial morphology in sagittal craniosynostosis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Trans-pairing between osteoclasts and osteoblasts shapes the cranial base during development.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- An Overview of Modelling Craniosynostosis Using the Finite Element Method.Molecular syndromology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
During postnatal calvarial growth the brain grows gradually and the overlying bones and sutures accommodate that growth until the later juvenile stages. The whole process is coordinated through a complex series of biological, chemical and perhaps mechanical signals between various elements of the craniofacial system. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent a computational model can accurately predict the calvarial growth in wild-type (WT) and mutant type (MT) Fgfr2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.