Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29243210›Full record

ReviewBulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology2018

An Embryonic Field of Study: The Aquatic Fate and Toxicity of Diluted Bitumen.

Ftoon Alsaadi, Peter V Hodson, Valerie S Langlois

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ftoon AlsaadiBiology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Peter V HodsonBiology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Valerie S LangloisBiology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. valerie.langlois@inrs.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-5801

Funding

Fisheries and Oceans Canada MECTS-3286879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canada has experienced a significant increase in the transport of diluted bitumen (dilbit), a predominant oil sands product that combines bitumen with diluents derived from oil-gas condensates and other proprietary compounds. The proportion of diluent and the chemical composition of dilbit vary to meet seasonal transport requirements. While the toxic effects of a variety of crude and refined oils are well-studied, the toxicity of dilbit to aquatic species is less well known. This focused review summarizes dilbit production, chemistry, and the few data on toxicity to aquatic species. These data suggest that un-weathered dilbit would cause effects on fish equivalent to those of conventional oils, but its toxicity may be lower, depending on interactions among test conditions, the behavior of dilbit added to water and the species tested.

Indexed as

AnimalsCanadaEmbryo, NonmammalianHydrocarbonsOil and Gas FieldsPetroleumPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalWeatherasphaltHydrocarbonsPetroleumPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalDiluted bitumen (dilbit)EcotoxicologyFishPipelinePolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon

Identifiers

PMID29243210
PMCPMC5775368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.