ReviewPlanta2018
Trends in plant research using molecular markers.
Review in Planta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in molecular breeding of medicinal plants.Molecular horticulture · 2026Review
- Ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis: Advancing bacterial genetics for sustainable agriculture.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- A review of post-GWAS studies in schizophrenia.Translational psychiatry · 2025Review
- Simple sequence repeats and their expansions: role in plant development, environmental response and adaptation.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- The Potential of Plant Tissue Cultures to Improve the Steviol Glycoside Profile of Stevia (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genetic Diversity and Association Analysis of Traits Related to Water-Use Efficiency and Nitrogen-Use Efficiency ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Integrating targeted genetic markers to genotyping-by-sequencing for an ultimate genotyping tool.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Article
- Differences inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Exploring Pan-Genomes: An Overview of Resources and Tools for Unraveling Structure, Function, and Evolution of Crop Genes and Genomes.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Identification of grapevine clones via high-throughput amplicon sequencing: a proof-of-concept study.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide SNP and Indel Discovery in Abaca (Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes of Medicinal HerbInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cost-effective duplex Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR markers for homologous genes facilitating wheat breeding.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Genetic Diversity Analysis and Core Germplasm Collection Construction of Radish Cultivars Based on Structure Variation Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- 3D genome organization and epigenetic regulation in autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Discovery of DNA polymorphisms via genome-resequencing and development of molecular markers between two barley cultivars.Plant cell reports · 2022Article
- Genome-wide association analysis to delineate high-quality SNPs for seed micronutrient density in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionA deep bibliometric analysis has been carried out, obtaining valuable parameters that facilitate the understanding around the research in plant using molecular markers. The evolution of the improvement in the field of agronomy is fundamental for its adaptation to the new exigencies that the current world context raises. In addition, within these improvements, this article focuses on those related to the biotechnology sector. More specifically, the use of DNA markers that allow the researcher to know the set of genes associated with a particular quantitative trait or QTL. The use of molecular markers is widely extended, including: restriction fragment length polymorphism, random-amplified polymorphic DNA, amplified fragment length polymorphism, microsatellites, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms. In addition to classical methodology, new approaches based on the next generation sequencing are proving to be fundamental. In this article, a historical review of the molecular markers traditionally used in plants, since its birth and how the new molecular tools facilitate the work of plant breeders is carried out. The evolution of the most studied cultures from the point of view of molecular markers is also reviewed and other parameters whose prior knowledge can facilitate the approach of researchers to this field of research are analyzed. The bibliometric analysis of molecular markers in plants shows that top five countries in this research are: US, China, India, France, and Germany, and from 2013, this research is led by China. On the other hand, the basic research using Arabidopsis is deeper in France and Germany, while other countries focused its efforts in their main crops as the US for wheat or maize, while China and India for wheat and rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29243155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.