Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29243115›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2018

Activity of taurolidine gels on ex vivo periodontal biofilm.

Luca Pirracchio, Aline Joos, Nina Luder, Anton Sculean, Sigrun Eick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Use of a taurolidine containing antimicrobial wash to reduce cardiac implantable electronic device infection.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca PirracchioSchool of Dental Medicine, Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Aline JoosSchool of Dental Medicine, Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Nina LuderSchool of Dental Medicine, Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Anton SculeanSchool of Dental Medicine, Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Sigrun EickSchool of Dental Medicine, Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland. sigrun.eick@zmk.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4619-2461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the activity of two different taurolidine (TAU) gels in comparison with a 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel on an ex vivo subgingival biofilm. MATERIAL AND

methodsSubgingival including supragingival biofilm samples from periodontitis patients were cultured for 10 days, before TAU 1% and TAU 3% gels and CHX gel were applied for 10 min and thereafter diluted with nutrient media to 10% for 50 min. One third of the samples were analyzed for bacterial counts, biofilm quantity, and biofilm metabolic activity. In the two other thirds, 90% of the nutrient media were replaced and biofilms were incubated for 23 h. The second third was analyzed in the same way as before. In the third part, patients' microorganisms were added again and incubated for additional 24 h to allow reformation of biofilm before proceeding to analysis.

resultsDecrease of bacterial counts in biofilms was highest following application of TAU 3% after 60 min (0.87 log

conclusionThe antimicrobial activity of taurolidine gels clearly depends on its taurolidine concentration. A high concentrated taurolidine gel is equally active or even superior to 0.2% chlorhexidine gel. However, the activity of antimicrobials is limited in a complex established biofilm and underlines the pivotal role of mechanical biofilm disruption. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Within their limits, the data suggest that TAU 3% gel might represent a potential alternative to 0.2% chlorhexidine gel.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalBacterial LoadBiofilmsChlorhexidineGelsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesPeriodontitisTaurineThiadiazinesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineGelsTaurinetaurolidineThiadiazinesAntimicrobialBiofilmPeriodontal therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.