Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29243054›Full record

ArticleAmbio2018

Strategies for reducing airborne pesticides under tropical conditions.

Tomaz Langenbach, Luiz Querino Caldas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Mobility and environmental monitoring of pesticides in the atmosphere - a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomaz LangenbachDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, R. Marques de São Vicente 225, Gávea, CEP 22451-041, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Luiz Querino CaldasDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, HUAP, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Marques do Paraná, 303, Centro, CEP 24030-150, Niterói, RJ, Brazil. lquerinoac@gmail.com.

Funding

FAPERJ 23450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazil is currently one of the largest pesticide consumers worldwide. However, a lack of scientific information regarding airborne pollution is still an issue, with tragic consequences to human health and the environment. To reduce pollution of the lower air layers, where pesticide spraying occurs, green barriers that filter the air could be an effective mitigation procedure. Modifying pulverization habits, by pulverizing in the late afternoon instead of in the morning could also reduce pesticide volatilization, while other recommendations with the purpose of lowering the pesticide amounts currently applied are likewise pursued. Data obtained about volatilization have demonstrated that, in order to reduce air pollution risks, one of the most effective preventive strategies is to ban products with high vapor pressure. Global/local stakeholders need to assume the responsibility to find the best way to reduce airborne pesticide pollution, which has increasingly shown disastrous effects as major poisons to human health and the environment.

Indexed as

Tropical ClimateAir PollutionBrazilHumansPesticidesVolatilizationPesticidesDrift reductionHuman poisoningsPesticide air pollutionPesticide pulverizationVolatilization

Identifiers

PMID29243054
PMCPMC6072638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.