ArticleRheumatology international2018
Diagnostic outcome and indications for testing in patients with positive ANCA at a Canadian tertiary care centre.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Positive Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane and Proteinase 3-Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody in Infective Endocarditis-Associated Glomerulonephritis: A Diagnostic Challenge.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Indications and diagnostic outcome of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody testing in hospital medicine: a pattern of over-screening.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Serum ANCA and Overall Mortality: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study on 1,024 Italian Subjects.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectiveWith widespread availability of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing, interpreting positive results has become increasingly challenging. Here, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate indications for testing and diagnosis of patients with positive ANCA.
methodsPositive ANCA tests (immunofluorescence or immunoassay) performed between April 2014 and March 2015 were identified using the Ottawa Hospital (TOH) laboratory information system. TOH electronic records of subjects with positive ANCA were reviewed.
results96 patients had first-time positive ANCA in the study year. The indications for testing were suspicion for: AAV in 22 patients (23%), unspecified vasculitis in 24(25%), an inflammatory condition in 46(48%), and unknown in 4(4%). Twenty-eight patients (29% of first-time positives) were diagnosed with AAV, corresponding to 16(72%), 8(33%), 4(9%), and 0 patients tested for these indications, respectively; 49(51%) of patients had other inflammatory or infectious etiologies, and non-inflammatory diagnoses accounted for the remaining 19(20%). One hundred and forty-four repeat ANCAs were performed with life-time mean of 4.4 re-tests per patient (range 0-44). Routine monitoring accounted for 86(72%) of all repeat tests. Management was changed following 34% of all re-tests performed for changed clinical status and 1% of re-tests conducted routinely.
conclusionFew patients who start with low clinical suspicion for AAV and have positive ANCA are subsequently diagnosed with AAV. Serial ANCA testing is common but is not supported by clear evidence, and rarely leads to change in management. Clarification of guidelines on effective ANCA ordering may reduce hospital laboratory costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29243051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.