Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29243019›Full record

ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2018

Evaluation of bone metastatic burden by bone SPECT/CT in metastatic prostate cancer patients: defining threshold value for total bone uptake and assessment in radium-223 treated patients.

Takuro Umeda, Mitsuru Koizumi, Shohei Fukai, Noriaki Miyaji, Kazuki Motegi, Shuto Nakazawa, Tomohiro Takiguchi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EANM practice guideline for quantitative SPECT-CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative [EJNMMI physics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takuro UmedaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-11 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Mitsuru KoizumiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-11 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. mitsuru@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8128-9760
Shohei FukaiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-11 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Noriaki MiyajiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-11 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Kazuki MotegiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-11 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Shuto NakazawaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-11 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Tomohiro TakiguchiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-8-11 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
The Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish a new three-dimensional quantitative evaluation method for bone metastasis, we applied bone single photon emission tomography with computed tomography (SPECT/CT). The total bone uptake (TBU), which measures active bone metastatic burden, was calculated as the sum of [mean uptake obtained as standardized uptake value (SUV) above a cut-off level] × (the volume of the lesion) in the trunk using bone SPECT/CT. We studied the threshold value and utility of TBU in prostate cancer patients treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) therapy.

methodsTo establish the threshold value of TBU, we compared bone metastatic and non-metastatic regions in 61 prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis and 69 without. Five fixed sites in each patient were selected as evaluation points and divided into bone metastatic and non-metastatic sites. Sensitivity and specificity analysis was applied to establish the threshold level. Using the obtained threshold value, we then calculated the TBU in nine prostate cancer patients who received Ra-223 therapy, and compared the results with the bone scan index (BSI) by BONENAVI

resultsUptake was significantly lower in non-metastatic sites in patients with bone metastasis than in patients without metastasis. Sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed SUV = 7.0 as the threshold level. There was a discrepancy between TBU and BSI change in two of the nine patients, in whom TBU change correlated with visual judgement, but BSI change did not. In two patients, BSI was nearly 0 throughout the course, but the TBU was positive and changed, although the change was not large. These results suggest that TBU may be more accurate and sensitive than BSI for quantitative evaluation of active bone metastatic burden.

conclusionWe established a threshold value (SUV > 7.0) for three-dimensional TBU for evaluating active bone metastatic burden in prostate cancer patients using bone SPECT/CT. Despite the small number of patients, we expect the change in TBU could be more accurate and sensitive than the change in BSI among patients who received Ra-223.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological TransportBone and BonesBone NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRadiumRadiumRadium-223Bone SPECT/CTProstate cancerRa-therapyTBU

Identifiers

PMID29243019
PMCPMC5797193
OpenAlexW2774913058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.