Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242994›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2018

Selective effects of different fatigue protocols on the function of upper body muscles assessed through the force-velocity relationship.

Amador García-Ramos, Alejandro Torrejón, Belén Feriche, Antonio J Morales-Artacho, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla, Paulino Padial, Slobodan Jaric

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Vertical Lifting Distance on Upper-Body Muscle Fatigue.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amador García-RamosDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. Alfacar, s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain. amagr@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0608-8755
Alejandro TorrejónDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. Alfacar, s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain.
Belén FericheDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. Alfacar, s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain.
Antonio J Morales-ArtachoDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. Alfacar, s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain.
Alejandro Pérez-CastillaDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. Alfacar, s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain.
Paulino PadialDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Ctra. Alfacar, s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain.
Slobodan JaricDepartment of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology and Biomechanics and Movement Science Graduate Program, University of Delaware, Newark, USA.

Funding

Serbian Research Council 175037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study explored the feasibility of the force-velocity relationship (F-V) to detect the acute effects of different fatigue protocols on the selective changes of the maximal capacities of upper body muscles to produce force, velocity, and power.

methodsAfter determining the bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM), participants' F-V relationships were assessed during the bench press throw exercise on five separate sessions after performing one of the following fatiguing protocols: 60%1RM failure, 60%1RM non-failure, 80%1RM failure, 80%1RM non-failure, and no-fatigue. In the non-failure protocols, participants performed half the maximum number of repetitions than in their respective failure protocols.

resultsThe main findings revealed that (1) all F-V relationships were highly linear (median r = 0.997 and r = 0.982 for averaged across participants and individual data, respectively), (2) the fatiguing protocols were ranked based on the magnitude of power loss as follows: 60%1RM failure > 80%1RM failure > 60%1RM non-failure > 80%1RM non-failure, while (3) the assessed maximum force and velocity outputs showed a particularly prominent reduction in the protocols based on the lowest and highest levels of fatigue (i.e., 80%1RM non-failure and 60%1RM failure), respectively.

conclusionsThe results support the use of F-V to assess the effects of fatigue on the distinctive capacities of the muscles to produce force, velocity, and power output while performing multi-joint tasks, while the assessed maximum force and velocity capacities showed a particularly prominent reduction in the protocols based on the lowest and highest levels of fatigue (i.e., 80%1RM non-failure and 60%1RM failure), respectively.

Indexed as

Muscle FatigueAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalRandom AllocationResistance TrainingTorsoBench pressForce–velocity relationshipMuscle functionResistance training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.