ReviewDer Orthopade2018
[Bone substitute materials as local drug carriers : Current status of substitutes of various origins].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of High-Grade Chronic Osteomyelitis and Nonunions with PerOssalJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- [Bone cement as a local antibiotic carrier].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Properties of Orthopaedic Cements Biomechanically Little Affected by Exceptional Use of Liquid Antibiotics.Orthopaedic surgery · 2021Article
- [Polymethyl methacrylate cement coating of intramedullary implants : A new technique for revision surgery with the example of a temporary knee arthrodesis. Video article].Der Orthopade · 2021Review
- [Clinical administration of platelet-rich plasma and growth factors to the musculoskeletal system].Der Orthopade · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutologous bone grafts (autografts) are used in surgery for defect filling and impaction grafting during hip socket and femur reconstruction. Because of their superior osteoinductive capacity, autografts are considered the "gold standard" for these treatments. However, because of a better cost-benefit ratio, allografts are also often used. In the case of limited donor availability for autologous or allogenic bone grafts, bone substitute materials (BSMs) are a reasonable alternative or supplement. BSM are based on or combine different substances. Growth factors of the bone morphogenetic protein family BMP are recombinant proteins that specifically induce the growth of bone and cartilage tissue. CHARACTERISTICS: One advantage of BSM is the option to combine them with several anti-infective agents. The choice of the anti-infective substance should not only be based on the antimicrobial efficacy, but should also take into account possible dose-dependent cellular and pharmacological side effects at the implantation site. Thus, microbiologists, pharmacists and surgeons should decide together which combination is the most appropriate. COMBINATION PRODUCTS: BSM with active agent additives are considered combination products that are characterized by a main effect (bone replacement function) and a secondary effect (prophylaxis of bacterial recolonization of BSM). Both functions must be thoroughly (clinically) evidenced in the course of the registration process as a class III medical device. Drug authorities evaluate the active agents, their function and corresponding indication. Currently, only a few combination products are available on the market. As a consequence of the only limited availability of such commercial combination products, surgeons in clinical practice often manually add the active agent to BSM in the theatre prior to implantation. However, such a customized addition of antibiotics places the surgeon in a situation of a manufacturer where he assumes liability for the product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.