Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242937›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2018

Paclitaxel With and Without Pazopanib for Persistent or Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Debra L Richardson, Michael W Sill, Robert L Coleman, Anil K Sood, Michael L Pearl, Siobhan M Kehoe, Michael E Carney, Parviz Hanjani, Linda Van Le, Xun C Zhou and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01468909 (A Randomized Phase IIB Evaluation of Weekly Paclitaxel), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01468909 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Phase IIB Evaluation of Weekly Paclitaxel (NSC #673089) Plus Pazopanib (NSC #737754) Versus Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Placebo in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2011 to 2018Enrolled106ConditionsRecurrent Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma, Recurrent Primary Peritoneal CarcinomaArmsLaboratory Biomarker Analysis, Paclitaxel, Pazopanib Hydrochloride, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Targeted therapy for mucinous ovarian carcinoma: evidence from clinical trials.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Debra L RichardsonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Michael W SillNRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Robert L ColemanUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Anil K SoodUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael L PearlDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Health Sciences Center T9, Stony Brook, New York.
Siobhan M KehoeDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Michael E CarneyUniversity of Hawaii, Women's Cancer Center, Honolulu.
Parviz HanjaniHanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, Pennsylvania.
Linda Van LeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Xun C ZhouDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, New Britain.
Angeles Alvarez SecordDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Heidi J GrayUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
Lisa M LandrumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oklahoma University Health Science Center, Oklahoma City.
Heather A LankesNRG Oncology Statistics & Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Wei HuUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Carol AghajanianDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USAbington Memorial Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOU HealthStony Brook University Hospital · USThe Hospital of Central Connecticut · USUniversity of Hawaii System · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceOvarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer deaths in the United States. Pazopanib is an oral, multitarget kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3; platelet-derived growth factor receptors α and β; and proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (c-KIT).

objectiveTo estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio (HR) of weekly paclitaxel and pazopanib compared with weekly paclitaxel and placebo in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. Secondary objectives included frequency and severity of adverse events, proportion responding, and overall survival (OS) in each arm. Translational research objectives included exploring the association between possible biomarkers and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in vascular endothelial growth factor A, interleukin 8, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α; and PFS, OS, and proportion responding. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 study was conducted at 26 participating institutions. Patients were enrolled between December 12, 2011, and April 22, 2013. Data were frozen on August 11, 2014. Participants were patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma with 1 to 3 prior regimens and performance status of 0 to 2. One hundred six patients enrolled; 100 were evaluable for toxic effects.

interventionsAll patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days and were randomized 1:1 to pazopanib 800 mg orally daily or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was PFS. The study was designed to detect a 37.5% reduction in the hazard with 80% power (α = 10%).

resultsA total of 106 women (median age [range], 61 [35-87] years; 88 [83%] white) were enrolled. Study arms were well balanced for age, performance status, measurable disease, and prior bevacizumab. Proportion responding was 14 of 44 (31.8%) vs 10 of 44 (22.7%) for pazopanib plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone. Median PFS was 7.5 vs 6.2 months for pazopanib plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone, respectively (HR, 0.84; 90% CI, 0.57-1.22; P = .20). Median OS was 20.7 vs 23.3 months for pazopanib plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone (HR, 1.04; 90% CI, 0.60-1.79; P = .90). Severe hypertension was more common on the pazopanib plus paclitaxel arm (relative risk, 12.0; 95% CI, 1.62-88.84). More patients discontinued treatment on the paclitaxel arm for disease progression (34 of 52 [65.4%] vs 17 of 54 [31.5%]), and more on the pazopanib plus paclitaxel arm for adverse events (20 of 54 [37%] vs 5 of 52 [9.6%]). No association was found between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (interleukin 8 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α) and OS and proportion responding. Patients with VEGFA CC genotype may be more resistant to weekly paclitaxel than those with the AC or AA genotype, with 1 of 14 (7%), 3 of 15 (20%), and 4 of 8 (50%) responding, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The combination of pazopanib plus paclitaxel is not superior to paclitaxel in women with recurrent ovarian cancer.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01468909.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDouble-Blind MethodDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansIndazolesMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelPlacebosIndazolesMAS1 protein, humanPaclitaxelpazopanibPlacebosProto-Oncogene MasPyrimidinesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID29242937
PMCPMC5838582
OpenAlexW2772288154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.