ArticleProceedings of ... International Conference on Advanced Robotics. International Conference on Advanced Robotics2015
Development of an MRI-Compatible Needle Driver for In-Bore Prostate Biopsy.
Article in Proceedings of ... International Conference on Advanced Robotics. International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinematic and mechanical modelling of a novel 4-DOF robotic needle guide for MRI-guided prostate intervention.Biomedical engineering advances · 2022Article
- Demonstration and Experimental Validation of Plastic-Encased Resonant Ultrasonic Piezoelectric Actuator for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Surgical Robots.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2020Article
- System Integration and Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of a Robotic System for MRI-Guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.Journal of medical robotics research · 2019Article
- DEMONSTRATION AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF PLASTIC-ENCASED RESONANT ULTRASONIC PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATOR FOR MRI-GUIDED SURGICAL ROBOTS.International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition : [proceedings]. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition · 2018Article
- Towards human-controlled, real-time shape sensing based flexible needle steering for MRI-guided percutaneous therapies.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimally invasive percutaneous approaches routinely employ insertion of needles into soft tissue for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Lack of targeting accuracy while inserting needles can significantly mitigate the effectiveness of these methods. Robot-assisted needle steering under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance is a viable option for reaching the target accurately. In this paper, we report the development of an MRI-compatible needle driver for in-bore prostate biopsy. The device easily mounts onto and works together with our previously developed MRI-compatible prostate interventional robot. It is the first robotic device using a standard biopsy gun, which is easily replaceable/detachable in case of multi-sampling biopsy applications. The mechanism enables rotation, translation, and triggering of the biopsy gun to steer the bevel needle through the tissue and to take samples accurately from the target loci. Using the rotational and translational capabilities, the same system can also assist brachytherapy needle placement. Preliminary experiments have shown that the design meets the requirements set by the clinical workflow. System feasibility was verified by multiple users inserting 2 different types of needles under visual feedback into a phantom made of soft plastic. The average targeting errors were 0.92 mm for 18 gauge biopsy and 1.65 mm for 20 gauge brachytherapy needle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.