Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242772›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2017

Fungal nomenclature evolving: changes adopted by the 19

David L Hawksworth, Tom W May, Scott A Redhead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Fungal taxonomy: A puzzle with many missing piecesBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular identification ofCurrent medical mycology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Chapter F of theIMA fungus · 2019
    Article
  10. Fungal systematics and evolution · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David L HawksworthJodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; and Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Tom W MayRoyal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Avenue, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Scott A RedheadOttawa Research and Development Centre, Science and Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, K.W Neatby Building, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article summarizes the key changes in the rules relating to the nomenclature of fungi made at the XIX International Botanical Congress in Shenzhen, China, in July 2017. Most significant was the decision to transfer decision-making on matters related only to the naming of fungi from International Botanical to International Mycological Congresses (IMCs). The rules relating to fungi are to be grouped together in a separate section of the

Indexed as

CodegovernanceICNlichenspleomorphic fungitypification

Identifiers

PMID29242772
PMCPMC5729709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.