Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242522›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2018

Amyloid-β and tau complexity - towards improved biomarkers and targeted therapies.

Juan Carlos Polanco, Chuanzhou Li, Liviu-Gabriel Bodea, Ramon Martinez-Marmol, Frederic A Meunier, Jürgen Götz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed, 371 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The cold truth: torpor as a confound in studies of caloric restriction.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Can cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers tell us something about financial capacity in Alzheimer's disease patients? A preliminary study.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2025
    Article
  16. Evaluation of the Anti-Alzheimer Activity ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan Carlos PolancoClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research (CJCADR), Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus - Brisbane, Upland Road, Building 79, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Chuanzhou LiClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research (CJCADR), Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus - Brisbane, Upland Road, Building 79, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Liviu-Gabriel BodeaClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research (CJCADR), Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus - Brisbane, Upland Road, Building 79, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Ramon Martinez-MarmolClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research (CJCADR), Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus - Brisbane, Upland Road, Building 79, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Frederic A MeunierClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research (CJCADR), Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus - Brisbane, Upland Road, Building 79, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Jürgen GötzClem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research (CJCADR), Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus - Brisbane, Upland Road, Building 79, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most neurodegenerative diseases are proteinopathies, which are characterized by the aggregation of misfolded proteins. Although many proteins have an intrinsic propensity to aggregate, particularly when cellular clearance systems start to fail in the context of ageing, only a few form fibrillar aggregates. In Alzheimer disease, the peptide amyloid-β (Aβ) and the protein tau aggregate to form plaques and tangles, respectively, which comprise the histopathological hallmarks of this disease. This Review discusses the complexity of Aβ biogenesis, trafficking, post-translational modifications and aggregation states. Tau and its various isoforms, which are subject to a vast array of post-translational modifications, are also explored. The methodological advances that revealed this complexity are described. Finally, the toxic effects of distinct species of tau and Aβ are discussed, as well as the concept of protein 'strains', and how this knowledge can facilitate the development of early disease biomarkers for stratifying patients and validating new therapies. By targeting distinct species of Aβ and tau for therapeutic intervention, the way might be paved for personalized medicine and more-targeted treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorBiomarkersHumanstau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorBiomarkerstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29242522
OpenAlexW2772202429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.