Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242387›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018

Inbred or Outbred? Genetic Diversity in Laboratory Rodent Colonies.

Thomas D Brekke, Katherine A Steele, John F Mulley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Spatial expression of myocardin protein in normal and disease states.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Auditory brainstem development of naked mole-rats (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas D BrekkeSchool of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, LL57 2DG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4479-1847
Katherine A SteeleSchool of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, LL57 2DG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-8857
John F MulleySchool of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, LL57 2DG, United Kingdom j.mulley@bangor.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1537-7316
Bangor University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonmodel rodents are widely used as subjects for both basic and applied biological research, but the genetic diversity of the study individuals is rarely quantified. University-housed colonies tend to be small and subject to founder effects and genetic drift; so they may be highly inbred or show substantial genetic divergence from other colonies, even those derived from the same source. Disregard for the levels of genetic diversity in an animal colony may result in a failure to replicate results if a different colony is used to repeat an experiment, as different colonies may have fixed alternative variants. Here we use high throughput sequencing to demonstrate genetic divergence in three isolated colonies of Mongolian gerbil (

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, Inbred StrainsAnimals, Outbred StrainsCricetinaeFemaleFounder EffectGenetic DriftGenetics, PopulationGerbillinaeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMiceRatsgenetic diversityinbreedinglaboratory rodentsMerionesreplication

Identifiers

PMID29242387
PMCPMC5919727
OpenAlexW2745099817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.