Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29242363›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Diagnostic Accuracy of Amino Acid and FDG-PET in Differentiating Brain Metastasis Recurrence from Radionecrosis after Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

H Li, L Deng, H X Bai, J Sun, Y Cao, Y Tao, L J States, M D Farwell, P Zhang, B Xiao and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04626206 (Multi-paramEtric Imaging to Assess Treatment REsponse After Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04626206 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Multi-paramEtric Imaging to Assess Treatment REsponse After Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRan2020 to 2021Enrolled12ConditionsBrain Metastases, Adult
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Are Dual-PhaseCancers · 2024
    Article
  12. Treatment Options for Brain Metastases.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

H LiFrom the Department of Neurology (H.L., L.D., L.Y.), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5422-2341
L DengFrom the Department of Neurology (H.L., L.D., L.Y.), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1623-4437
H X BaiDepartments of Radiology (H.X.B., J.S., M.D.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-9614-2163
J SunDepartments of Radiology (H.X.B., J.S., M.D.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-9254-4245
Y CaoCancer Research Institute (Y.C., Y.T.), Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7883-5057
Y TaoCancer Research Institute (Y.C., Y.T.), Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1144-2018
L J StatesDepartment of Radiology (L.J.S.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4024-2691
M D FarwellDepartments of Radiology (H.X.B., J.S., M.D.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-1041-7075
P ZhangPathology (P.Z.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6810-8681
B XiaoDepartment of Neurology (B.X.), Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China. yangli762@csu.edu.cn xiaobo_xy@126.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-1902
L YangFrom the Department of Neurology (H.L., L.D., L.Y.), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China yangli762@csu.edu.cn xiaobo_xy@126.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9444-4363
Central South University · CNResearch Institute of Radiology · BYChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent studies that analyze the usefulness of amino acid and FDG-PET in distinguishing brain metastasis recurrence and radionecrosis after radiation therapy are limited by small cohort size. PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of amino acid and FDG-PET in differentiating brain metastasis recurrence from radionecrosis after radiation therapy. DATA SOURCES: Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: Fifteen studies were included from the literature. Each study used PET to differentiate radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in contrast-enhancing lesions on follow-up brain MR imaging after treating brain metastasis with radiation therapy. DATA ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed with a bivariate random-effects model. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were pooled, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was fit to the data. DATA SYNTHESIS: The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of PET were 0.85, 0.88, 7.0, 0.17, and 40, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93. On subgroup analysis of different tracers, amino acid and FDG-PET had similar diagnostic accuracy. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that the method of quantification based on patient, lesion, or PET scan (based on lesion versus not, LIMITATIONS: Our study was limited by small sample size, and 60% of the included studies were of retrospective design.

conclusionsAmino acid and FDG-PET had good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating brain metastasis recurrence from radionecrosis after radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation InjuriesRadiopharmaceuticalsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID29242363
PMCPMC7410573
OpenAlexW2774229814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.